Edelen Ashley N, Cashman Sarah, Young Ben, Ingwersen Wesley W
Eastern Research Group, Inc., Lexington, MA 02421, USA.
Center for Environmental Solutions and Emergency Response, Office of Research and Development, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH 45220, USA.
Appl Sci (Basel). 2022 Sep 27;12(19):1-14. doi: 10.3390/app12199687.
As a fundamental component of data for life cycle assessment models, elementary flows have been demonstrated to be a key requirement of life cycle assessment data interoperability. However, existing elementary flow lists have been found to lack sufficient structure to enable improved interoperability between life cycle data sources. The Federal Life Cycle Assessment Commons Elementary Flow List provides a novel framework and structure for elementary flows, but the actual improvement this list provides to the interoperability of life cycle data has not been tested. The interoperability of ten elementary flow lists, two life cycle assessment databases, three life cycle impact assessment methods, and five life cycle assessment software sources is assessed with and without use of the Federal Life Cycle Assessment Commons Elementary Flow List as an intermediary in flow mapping. This analysis showed that only 25% of comparisons between these sources resulted in greater than 50% of flows being capable of automatic name-to-name matching between lists. This indicates that there is a low level of interoperability when using sources with their original elementary flow nomenclature, and elementary flow mapping is required to use these sources in combination. The mapping capabilities of the Federal Life Cycle Assessment Commons Elementary Flow List to sources were reviewed and revealed a notable increase in name-to-name matches. Overall, this novel framework is found to increase life cycle data source interoperability.
作为生命周期评估模型数据的基本组成部分,基本流已被证明是生命周期评估数据互操作性的关键要求。然而,现有的基本流列表被发现缺乏足够的结构,无法提高生命周期数据源之间的互操作性。联邦生命周期评估共享基本流列表为基本流提供了一个新颖的框架和结构,但该列表对生命周期数据互操作性的实际改进尚未得到测试。在流映射中使用和不使用联邦生命周期评估共享基本流列表作为中介的情况下,评估了十个基本流列表、两个生命周期评估数据库、三种生命周期影响评估方法和五个生命周期评估软件源的互操作性。该分析表明,这些源之间只有25%的比较结果是超过50%的流能够在列表之间进行自动名称对名称匹配。这表明,在使用具有原始基本流命名法的源时,互操作性水平较低,需要进行基本流映射才能组合使用这些源。对联邦生命周期评估共享基本流列表与源的映射能力进行了审查,结果显示名称对名称匹配显著增加。总体而言,发现这个新颖的框架提高了生命周期数据源的互操作性。