University of Kent, Canterbury, United Kingdom.
The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2022 Nov 4;17(11):e0275440. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275440. eCollection 2022.
Research has documented robust associations between greater disgust sensitivity and (1) concerns about disease, and (2) political conservatism. However, the COVID-19 disease pandemic raised challenging questions about these associations. In particular, why have conservatives-despite their greater disgust sensitivity-exhibited less concern about the pandemic? Here, we investigate this "conservatism-disgust paradox" and address several outstanding theoretical questions regarding the interrelations among disgust sensitivity, ideology, and pandemic response. In four studies (N = 1,764), we identify several methodological and conceptual factors-in particular, an overreliance on self-report measures-that may have inflated the apparent associations among these constructs. Using non-self-report measures, we find evidence that disgust sensitivity may be a less potent predictor of disease avoidance than is typically assumed, and that ideological differences in disgust sensitivity may be amplified by self-report measures. These findings suggest that the true pattern of interrelations among these factors may be less "paradoxical" than is typically believed.
研究记录了更大的厌恶敏感性与(1)对疾病的担忧,以及(2)政治保守主义之间的强相关性。然而,COVID-19 疾病大流行对这些关联提出了具有挑战性的问题。特别是,为什么保守派——尽管他们的厌恶敏感性更高——对大流行的担忧却更少?在这里,我们调查了这种“保守主义-厌恶悖论”,并解决了几个关于厌恶敏感性、意识形态和大流行应对之间相互关系的悬而未决的理论问题。在四项研究中(N=1764),我们确定了几个方法学和概念性因素——特别是过度依赖自我报告措施——这些因素可能夸大了这些结构之间的明显关联。使用非自我报告措施,我们发现证据表明,厌恶敏感性可能不像通常假设的那样是疾病回避的有力预测因素,而自我报告措施可能放大了厌恶敏感性在意识形态上的差异。这些发现表明,这些因素之间的真实相互关系模式可能不像通常认为的那样“矛盾”。