McIsaac Warren J, Senthinathan Arrani, Moineddin Rahim, Nakamachi Yoshiko, Dresser Linda, McIntyre Mark, Singh Suzanne, De Oliveira Nelia, Tannenbaum David, Bloom Jeff, Lemieux Camille, Marr Patricia, Levy Michelle, Mitri Mira, Walji Sakina, Kukan Sahana, Morris Andrew M
Ray D. Wolfe Department of Family Medicine, Sinai Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
J Assoc Med Microbiol Infect Dis Can. 2021 May 3;6(1):32-48. doi: 10.3138/jammi-2020-0021. eCollection 2021 Mar.
Effective community-based antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) are needed because 90% of antimicrobials are prescribed in the community. A primary care ASP (PC-ASP) was evaluated for its effectiveness in lowering antibiotic prescriptions for six common infections.
A multi-faceted educational program was assessed using a before-and-after design in four primary care clinics from 2015 through 2017. The primary outcome was the difference between control and intervention clinics in total antibiotic prescriptions for six common infections before and after the intervention. Secondary outcomes included changes in condition-specific antibiotic use, delayed antibiotic prescriptions, prescriptions exceeding 7 days duration, use of recommended antibiotics, and emergency department visits or hospitalizations within 30 days. Multi-method models adjusting for demographics, case mix, and clustering by physician were used to estimate treatment effects.
Total antibiotic prescriptions in control and intervention clinics did not differ (difference in differences = 1.7%; 95% CI -12.5% to 15.9%), nor did use of delayed prescriptions (-5.2%; 95% CI -24.2% to 13.8%). Prescriptions for longer than 7 days were significantly reduced (-21.3%; 95% CI -42.5% to -0.1%). However, only 781 of 1,777 encounters (44.0%) involved providers who completed the ASP education. Where providers completed the education, delayed prescriptions increased 17.7% ( = 0.06), and prescriptions exceeding 7 days duration declined (-27%; 95% CI -48.3% to -5.6%). Subsequent emergency department visits and hospitalizations did not increase.
PC-ASP effectiveness on antibiotic use was variable. Shorter prescription durations and increased use of delayed prescriptions were adopted by engaged primary care providers.
由于90%的抗菌药物是在社区开具的,因此需要有效的基于社区的抗菌药物管理计划(ASP)。对一项初级保健ASP(PC-ASP)降低六种常见感染抗生素处方量的有效性进行了评估。
采用前后设计,于2015年至2017年在四家初级保健诊所对一项多方面的教育计划进行了评估。主要结局是干预前后,对照诊所和干预诊所六种常见感染的总抗生素处方量之差。次要结局包括特定疾病抗生素使用的变化、延迟开具抗生素处方、超过7天疗程的处方、推荐抗生素的使用,以及30天内的急诊就诊或住院情况。使用针对人口统计学、病例组合和医生聚类进行调整的多方法模型来估计治疗效果。
对照诊所和干预诊所的总抗生素处方量没有差异(差值差异=1.7%;95%置信区间为-12.5%至15.9%),延迟处方的使用也没有差异(-5.2%;95%置信区间为-24.2%至13.8%)。超过7天的处方量显著减少(-21.3%;95%置信区间为-42.5%至-0.1%)。然而,在1777次诊疗中,只有781次(44.0%)涉及完成了ASP教育的提供者。在提供者完成教育的情况下,延迟处方增加了17.7%(P=0.06),超过7天疗程的处方量下降(-27%;95%置信区间为-48.3%至-5.6%)。随后的急诊就诊和住院情况没有增加。
PC-ASP在抗生素使用方面的有效性存在差异。积极参与的初级保健提供者采用了更短的处方疗程并增加了延迟处方的使用。