Suppr超能文献

大豆对干旱的耐受性得益于光合特性的部分恢复。

Soybean resilience to drought is supported by partial recovery of photosynthetic traits.

作者信息

Elsalahy Heba H, Reckling Moritz

机构信息

Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Müncheberg, Germany.

Albrecht Daniel Thaer-Institute of Agricultural and Horticultural Sciences - Crop Science, Humboldt-University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Front Plant Sci. 2022 Oct 20;13:971893. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.971893. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

Climate change affects precipitation dynamics and the variability of drought frequency, intensity, timing, and duration. This represents a high risk in spring-sown grain legumes such as soybean. Yet, under European conditions, no evidence supports the potential recovery and resilience of drought-tolerant soybean cultivars after episodic drought, at different growth stages. A field experiment was conducted using a representative drought-tolerant cultivar of soybean (cv. Acardia), in 2020 and 2021, on sandy soils in Germany, applying four water regimes (irrigated, rainfed, early-drought, and late-drought stress). Drought stress was simulated by covering the plots during the event of rain with 6 × 6 m rainout shelters, at the vegetative (V-stage) and flowering (Fl-stage) stages. Drought response was quantified on plant height, chlorophyll fluorescence ratio (ChlF ratio), chlorophyll content (Chlc), and leaf surface temperature (LST), at different intervals after simulating drought until pod filling. Grain yield and yield components were quantified at the end of the growing season. Compared to rainfed conditions, a drought at V-stage and Fl-stage reduced significantly plant height, ChlF ratio, and Chlc by 20%, 11%, and 7%, respectively, but increased LST by 21% during the recovery phase. There was no recovery from drought except for Chlc after V-stage in 2021, that significantly recovered by 40% at the end of the growing season, signifying a partial recovery of the photochemical apparatus. Especially, there was no recovery observed in LST, implying the inability of soybean to restore LST within the physiological functional range (). Under rainfed conditions, the grain yield reached 2.9 t ha in 2020 and 5.2 t ha in 2021. However, the episodic drought reduced the yield at V-stage and Fl-stage, by 63% and 25% in 2020, and 21% and 36% in 2021, respectively. To conclude, the timing of drought was less relevant for soybean resilience; however, pre- and post-drought soil moisture, drought intensity, and drought duration were likely more important. A drought-tolerant soybean cultivar may partially be drought-resilient due to the recovery of photosynthetic traits, but not the leaf thermal traits. Overall, these findings will accelerate future efforts by plant breeders, aimed at improving soybean drought resilience.

摘要

气候变化影响降水动态以及干旱频率、强度、发生时间和持续时间的变异性。这对大豆等春播豆类作物构成了高风险。然而,在欧洲条件下,没有证据支持耐旱大豆品种在不同生长阶段经历偶发性干旱后具有潜在的恢复能力和复原力。2020年和2021年,在德国的沙质土壤上,使用具有代表性的耐旱大豆品种(阿卡迪亚品种)进行了田间试验,采用了四种水分处理方式(灌溉、雨养、早期干旱和晚期干旱胁迫)。在营养生长阶段(V期)和开花阶段(Fl期),通过在降雨期间用6×6米的防雨棚覆盖试验地来模拟干旱胁迫。在模拟干旱后直至结荚期的不同时间间隔,对株高、叶绿素荧光比率(ChlF比率)、叶绿素含量(Chlc)和叶片表面温度(LST)进行干旱响应量化。在生长季节结束时对籽粒产量和产量构成因素进行量化。与雨养条件相比,V期和Fl期的干旱分别使株高、ChlF比率和Chlc显著降低20%、11%和7%,但在恢复阶段使LST升高了21%。除2021年V期后的Chlc在生长季节结束时显著恢复40%外,干旱没有恢复,这表明光化学装置有部分恢复。特别是,未观察到LST的恢复,这意味着大豆无法在生理功能范围内恢复LST。在雨养条件下,2020年籽粒产量达到2.9吨/公顷,2021年达到5.2吨/公顷。然而,偶发性干旱使V期和Fl期的产量分别在2020年降低了63%和25%,在2021年降低了21%和36%。总之,干旱发生时间对大豆的复原力影响较小;然而,干旱前后的土壤湿度、干旱强度和干旱持续时间可能更为重要。耐旱大豆品种可能由于光合特性的恢复而具有部分耐旱复原能力,但叶片热特性则不然。总体而言,这些发现将加速植物育种者未来旨在提高大豆耐旱复原力的努力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2c2d/9632626/f3e925a535bb/fpls-13-971893-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验