Department of Medicine, Brown University Warren Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
Public Health and Research Support, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
Open Heart. 2022 Nov;9(2). doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2022-002094.
Cardiac rehabilitation has proven beneficial in cardiovascular patients and is strongly recommended for secondary prevention after a coronary event. However, overall utilisation of cardiac rehabilitation is often low. The addition of novel methods of rehabilitation may increase overall compliance with cardiac rehabilitation. The use of virtual reality (VR) has been adopted in a variety of therapeutic ways such as physical rehabilitation in neurological diseases, rehabilitation for various psychiatric illnesses and postcancer rehabilitation in breast cancer survivors. In our meta-analysis, we wish to assess whether the addition of VR (fully immersive or non-immersive) leads to an improvement in anxiety and functional capacity compared with standard cardiac rehabilitation at any phase of the rehabilitation process.
This systematic review and meta-analysis protocol was structured according to the published Preferred Reporting for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis-Protocol guidelines. We will devise a search strategy to use online databases to search for the randomised controlled trials. Inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria will be defined. The articles will be reviewed by two independent reviewers and any conflict will be adjudicated through discussion. The bias in the selected studies will be assessed using Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomised trials (RoB 2). The outcome of interest will be anxiety and functional capacity. Effect estimates will be reported as standardised mean difference with 95% CI. Fixed effect model will be used if I <60%, otherwise random effect model will be used to estimate the effect size.
There will be no direct involvement of the patient or the public in the conception, design, data collection and analysis of this systematic review and meta-analysis. Results of this systematic review and meta-analysis will be disseminated via journal articles. In accordance with the guidelines, our systematic review protocol is prospectively registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) on 07 August 2022.
CRD 42022342736.
心脏康复已被证明对心血管患者有益,并且强烈建议在冠状动脉事件后进行二级预防。然而,心脏康复的整体利用率往往较低。采用新的康复方法可能会提高心脏康复的整体依从性。虚拟现实 (VR) 的使用已被应用于各种治疗方法,如神经病学中的物理康复、各种精神疾病的康复以及乳腺癌幸存者的癌症后康复。在我们的荟萃分析中,我们希望评估在康复过程的任何阶段,与标准心脏康复相比,添加 VR(完全沉浸式或非沉浸式)是否会导致焦虑和功能能力的改善。
本系统评价和荟萃分析方案根据已发表的系统评价和荟萃分析-方案首选报告指南进行构建。我们将制定搜索策略,使用在线数据库搜索随机对照试验。将定义纳入标准和排除标准。将由两名独立评审员审查文章,如果有任何争议,将通过讨论进行裁决。将使用 Cochrane 随机试验偏倚风险工具 (RoB 2) 评估所选研究的偏倚。感兴趣的结果将是焦虑和功能能力。将使用标准化均数差值和 95%置信区间报告效应估计值。如果 I < 60%,将使用固定效应模型,否则将使用随机效应模型来估计效应量。
本系统评价和荟萃分析的构思、设计、数据收集和分析不会直接涉及患者或公众。本系统评价和荟萃分析的结果将通过期刊文章传播。根据指南,我们的系统评价方案于 2022 年 8 月 7 日在国际前瞻性系统评价登记处(PROSPERO)前瞻性注册。
PROSPERO 编号:CRD 42022342736。