Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Frankston Hospital, Frankston, Victoria, Australia.
Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Calvary Public Hospital, Bruce, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
Intern Med J. 2023 Apr;53(4):481-491. doi: 10.1111/imj.15964. Epub 2022 Nov 17.
Virtual communication has become common practice during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic because of visitation restrictions.
The authors aimed to evaluate overall family satisfaction with the intensive care unit (FS-ICU) care involving virtual communication strategies during the COVID-19 pandemic period.
In this prospective multicentre study involving three metropolitan hospitals in Melbourne, Australia, the next of kin (NOK) of all eligible ICU patients between 1 July 2020 and 31 October 2020 were requested to complete an adapted version of the FS-ICU 24-questionnaire. Group comparisons were analysed and calculated for family satisfaction scores: ICU/care (satisfaction with care), FS-ICU/dm (satisfaction with information/decision-making) and FS-ICU/total (overall satisfaction with the ICU). The essential predictors that influence family satisfaction were identified using quantitative and qualitative analyses.
Seventy-three of the 227 patients' NOK who initially agreed completed the FS-ICU questionnaire (response rate 32.2%). The mean FS-ICU/total was 63.9 (standard deviation [SD], 30.8). The mean score for satisfaction with FS-ICU/dm was lower than the FS-ICU/care (62.1 [SD, 30.3) vs 65.4 (SD, 31.4); P < 0.001]. There was no difference in mean FS-ICU/total scores between survivors (n = 65; 89%) and non-survivors (n = 8, 11%). Higher patient Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III score, female NOK and the patient dying in the ICU were independent predictors for FS-ICU/total score, while a telephone call at least once a day by an ICU doctor was related to family satisfaction for FS-ICU/dm.
There was low overall family satisfaction with ICU care and virtual communication strategies adopted during the COVID-19 pandemic. Efforts should be targeted for improving factors with virtual communication that cause low family satisfaction during the COVID-19 pandemic.
由于探视限制,虚拟沟通在 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行期间已成为常规做法。
作者旨在评估在 COVID-19 大流行期间使用虚拟沟通策略的重症监护病房(ICU)整体家庭满意度。
在这项涉及澳大利亚墨尔本的三家大都市医院的前瞻性多中心研究中,2020 年 7 月 1 日至 2020 年 10 月 31 日期间,所有符合条件的 ICU 患者的近亲属(NOK)被要求填写一份 FS-ICU 24 问题调查问卷的改编版。对组间比较进行分析和计算,以获得家庭满意度评分:ICU/护理(护理满意度)、FS-ICU/dm(信息/决策满意度)和 FS-ICU/总分(对 ICU 的总体满意度)。使用定量和定性分析确定影响家庭满意度的基本预测因素。
最初同意的 227 名患者的 NOK 中有 73 名完成了 FS-ICU 问卷(应答率为 32.2%)。FS-ICU/总分的平均值为 63.9(标准差 [SD],30.8)。FS-ICU/dm 满意度评分低于 FS-ICU/care(62.1 [SD,30.3)与 65.4 [SD,31.4];P <0.001)。幸存者(n = 65;89%)和非幸存者(n = 8;11%)之间的 FS-ICU/总分平均值没有差异。患者急性生理学和慢性健康评估 III 评分较高、女性 NOK 和患者在 ICU 中死亡是 FS-ICU/总分评分的独立预测因素,而 ICU 医生每天至少打一次电话与 FS-ICU/dm 的家庭满意度相关。
在 COVID-19 大流行期间,ICU 护理和采用的虚拟沟通策略的整体家庭满意度较低。应针对在 COVID-19 大流行期间导致虚拟沟通满意度低的因素进行改进。