Tri-institutional Center for Translational Research in Neuroimaging and Data Science (TReNDS), Georgia State University, Georgia Institute of Technology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA; Georgia State University, Department of Computer Science, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Tri-institutional Center for Translational Research in Neuroimaging and Data Science (TReNDS), Georgia State University, Georgia Institute of Technology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA; Georgia State University, Department of Computer Science, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Neuroimage. 2022 Dec 1;264:119737. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119737. Epub 2022 Nov 7.
Brain network interactions are commonly assessed via functional (network) connectivity, captured as an undirected matrix of Pearson correlation coefficients. Functional connectivity can represent static and dynamic relations, but often these are modeled using a fixed choice for the data window Alternatively, deep learning models may flexibly learn various representations from the same data based on the model architecture and the training task. However, the representations produced by deep learning models are often difficult to interpret and require additional posthoc methods, e.g., saliency maps. In this work, we integrate the strengths of deep learning and functional connectivity methods while also mitigating their weaknesses. With interpretability in mind, we present a deep learning architecture that exposes a directed graph layer that represents what the model has learned about relevant brain connectivity. A surprising benefit of this architectural interpretability is significantly improved accuracy in discriminating controls and patients with schizophrenia, autism, and dementia, as well as age and gender prediction from functional MRI data. We also resolve the window size selection problem for dynamic directed connectivity estimation as we estimate windowing functions from the data, capturing what is needed to estimate the graph at each time-point. We demonstrate efficacy of our method in comparison with multiple existing models that focus on classification accuracy, unlike our interpretability-focused architecture. Using the same data but training different models on their own discriminative tasks we are able to estimate task-specific directed connectivity matrices for each subject. Results show that the proposed approach is also more robust to confounding factors compared to standard dynamic functional connectivity models. The dynamic patterns captured by our model are naturally interpretable since they highlight the intervals in the signal that are most important for the prediction. The proposed approach reveals that differences in connectivity among sensorimotor networks relative to default-mode networks are an important indicator of dementia and gender. Dysconnectivity between networks, specially sensorimotor and visual, is linked with schizophrenic patients, however schizophrenic patients show increased intra-network default-mode connectivity compared to healthy controls. Sensorimotor connectivity was important for both dementia and schizophrenia prediction, but schizophrenia is more related to dysconnectivity between networks whereas, dementia bio-markers were mostly intra-network connectivity.
脑网络相互作用通常通过功能(网络)连接来评估,其表现为皮尔逊相关系数的无向矩阵。功能连接可以表示静态和动态关系,但通常使用固定的数据窗口来对其进行建模。或者,深度学习模型可以根据模型结构和训练任务从同一数据中灵活地学习各种表示。然而,深度学习模型产生的表示往往难以解释,需要额外的事后分析方法,例如显著图。在这项工作中,我们整合了深度学习和功能连接方法的优势,同时减轻了它们的弱点。考虑到可解释性,我们提出了一种深度学习架构,该架构具有表示模型对相关脑连接学习的有向图层。这种架构可解释性的一个惊人的好处是,在从功能磁共振成像数据中区分精神分裂症、自闭症和痴呆症患者与对照组、预测年龄和性别方面,显著提高了准确性。我们还通过从数据中估计窗口函数来解决动态有向连接估计的窗口大小选择问题,从而在每个时间点捕获估计图所需的信息。我们还将其与多个关注分类准确性的现有模型进行了比较,证明了我们方法的有效性,而我们的方法则侧重于可解释性。使用相同的数据,但对每个模型的自身判别任务进行单独训练,我们能够为每个受试者估计特定任务的有向连接矩阵。结果表明,与标准动态功能连接模型相比,该方法对混杂因素也更稳健。我们的模型捕捉到的动态模式是自然可解释的,因为它们突出了对预测最重要的信号间隔。所提出的方法表明,相对于默认模式网络,感觉运动网络之间的连接差异是痴呆症和性别差异的一个重要指标。网络之间的连接中断,特别是感觉运动和视觉之间的连接中断,与精神分裂症患者有关,然而与健康对照组相比,精神分裂症患者的默认模式网络内连接增加。感觉运动连接对于痴呆症和精神分裂症的预测都很重要,但精神分裂症与网络之间的连接中断更为相关,而痴呆症生物标志物主要是网络内连接。