School of Economics and Management, Zhejiang A & F University, Hangzhou 311300, China.
School of Economics and Management, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 7;19(21):14590. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192114590.
Although absolute poverty has been eliminated in rural China, multidimensional poverty has an unstoppable impact on the self-rated health of rural households through multiple dimensions. This study constructed a moderated mediation model with multidimensional poverty as the independent variable to explore the impact on rural households' self-rated health, social capital as a mediating variable, and family care as a moderating variable. We used the survey data of 382 sample out-of-poverty rural households in Jiangxi, China, in 2020. Our results indicated that multidimensional poverty had a detrimental impact on the self-rated health and social capital of rural households, both of which were significant at the 1% level (β = -0.751, t = -4.775, and β = -0.197, t = -7.08). A test of the mediating effect of social capital using the mediation model found the mediating effect accounting for 84.95% of the entire effect of multidimensional poverty on rural households' self-rated health. Further, the interaction term between family care and multidimensional poverty and its beneficial effect on social capital as well as the interaction term between family care and social capital and its negative effect on rural household' self-rated health are both statistically significant at the 1% level (β = 0.558, t = -5.221 and β = -2.100, t = -3.304). It is revealed that multidimensional poverty affects rural households' self-rated health through social capital and that family care moderates the mediating pathway. Family care exacerbates the negative effect of multidimensional poverty on rural households' self-rated health and weakens the beneficial effect of social capital on rural households' self-rated health. The lower (higher) the level of family care, the more significant the positive (negative) effect of social capital on rural households' health. Therefore, rural households should prioritize building social capital and shifting the responsibility for family care. First, through enhancing housing infrastructure and establishing cultural and educational initiatives, households can improve their viability. Second, increasing engagement in group activities will enhance social networks and boost interpersonal connections. Finally, to lessen the stress on family caregivers, building socialized care services can cover the gap in family care.
虽然中国农村地区已经消除了绝对贫困,但多维贫困通过多个维度对农村家庭的自评健康产生了不可阻挡的影响。本研究构建了一个有调节的中介模型,以多维贫困为自变量,探讨其对农村家庭自评健康的影响,社会资本为中介变量,家庭关怀为调节变量。我们使用了 2020 年中国江西 382 户脱贫农村家庭的调查数据。研究结果表明,多维贫困对农村家庭的自评健康和社会资本都有不利影响,在 1%的水平上都是显著的(β=-0.751,t=-4.775,β=-0.197,t=-7.08)。使用中介模型检验社会资本的中介效应发现,社会资本的中介效应占多维贫困对农村家庭自评健康总效应的 84.95%。此外,家庭关怀与多维贫困的交互项及其对社会资本的有益影响,以及家庭关怀与社会资本的交互项及其对农村家庭自评健康的负面影响,在 1%的水平上均具有统计学意义(β=0.558,t=-5.221,β=-2.100,t=-3.304)。这表明,多维贫困通过社会资本影响农村家庭的自评健康,家庭关怀调节中介路径。家庭关怀加剧了多维贫困对农村家庭自评健康的负面影响,削弱了社会资本对农村家庭自评健康的有益影响。家庭关怀水平越低(越高),社会资本对农村家庭健康的积极(消极)影响越显著。因此,农村家庭应该优先建立社会资本,转移家庭关怀责任。首先,通过加强住房基础设施建设和开展文化教育活动,家庭可以提高其生存能力。其次,增加参与群体活动将增强社会网络,促进人际联系。最后,为了减轻家庭护理人员的压力,可以建立社会化的护理服务来弥补家庭护理的不足。