School of Biological, Earth & Environmental Sciences, University College Cork, Distillery Fields, Cork, Ireland.
Environmental Research Institute, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
J Anim Ecol. 2023 Jan;92(1):7-15. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.13841. Epub 2022 Nov 15.
Natural selection can only occur if individuals differ in fitness. For this reason, the variance in relative fitness has been equated with the 'opportunity for selection' ( ), which has a long, albeit somewhat controversial, history. In this paper we discuss the use/misuse of and related metrics in evolutionary ecology. The opportunity is only realised if some fraction of is caused by trait variation. Thus, does not imply that selection is occurring, as sometimes erroneously assumed, because all fitness variation could be independent of phenotype. The selection intensity on any given trait cannot exceed , but this upper limit will never be reached because (a) stochastic factors always affect fitness, and (b) there might be multiple traits under selection. The expected magnitude of the stochastic component of is negatively correlated with mean fitness. Uncertainty in realised is also larger when mean fitness or population/sample size are low. Variation in across time or space thus can be dominated (or solely driven) by variation in the strength of demographic stochasticity. We illustrate these points using simulations and empirical data from a population study on great tits Parus major. Our analysis shows that the scope for fecundity selection in the great tits is substantially higher when using annual number of recruits as the fitness measure, rather than fledglings or eggs, even after adjusting for the dependence of on mean fitness. This suggests nonrandom survival of juveniles across families between life stages. Indeed, previous work on this population has shown that offspring recruitment is often nonrandom with respect to clutch size and laying date of parents, for example. We conclude that one cannot make direct inferences about selection based on fitness data alone. However, examining variation in (the opportunity for fecundity selection adjusted for mean fitness) across life stages, years or environments can offer clues as to when/where fecundity selection might be strongest, which can be useful for research planning and experimental design.
自然选择只有在个体适应度存在差异时才会发生。出于这个原因,相对适应度的方差一直等同于“选择机会”(),这个概念虽然存在一些争议,但历史悠久。在本文中,我们讨论了在进化生态学中使用/误用和相关指标的问题。只有当部分相对适应度的差异是由性状变异引起时,选择机会才会实现。因此,并不意味着选择正在发生,就像有时错误假设的那样,因为所有的适应度变化都可能与表型无关。任何给定性状的选择强度都不能超过,但这个上限永远不会达到,因为(a)随机因素总是会影响适应度,(b)可能有多个性状受到选择。的随机成分的预期大小与平均适应度呈负相关。当平均适应度或种群/样本量较低时,实现的不确定性也会更大。因此,跨越时间或空间的变化可能主要由人口统计随机性的强度变化所驱动。我们使用来自对大山雀的种群研究的模拟和经验数据来说明这些观点。我们的分析表明,当使用年度新孵出的雏鸟数量作为适应度衡量标准时,大山雀的繁殖力选择范围要大得多,而不是幼鸟或卵,即使在调整了与平均适应度的依赖关系之后也是如此。这表明在生命阶段之间,幼鸟的存活是非随机的,跨越了家庭。事实上,之前对这个种群的研究表明,例如,后代的招募通常与父母的窝卵数和产卵日期有关。我们得出的结论是,不能仅根据适应度数据就对选择做出直接推断。然而,检查适应度(调整后的平均适应度的繁殖力选择机会)在生命阶段、年份或环境之间的变化,可以提供关于何时/何地繁殖力选择可能最强的线索,这对于研究计划和实验设计很有用。