Department of Endodontics, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Dentistry, Richmond, VA, 23298, USA.
Department of Endodontics, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA.
Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 16;12(1):19664. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-20918-w.
Treatment planning is key to clinical success. Permanent teeth diagnosed with "irreversible pulpitis" have long been implied to have an irreversibly damaged dental pulp that is beyond repair and warranting root canal treatment. However, newer clinical approaches such as pulpotomy, a minimally invasive and biologically based procedure have re-emerged to manage teeth with pulpitis. The primary aim of the study was to conduct a meta-analysis to comprehensively estimate the overall success rate of pulpotomy in permanent teeth with irreversible pulpitis as a result of carious pulp exposure. The secondary aim of the study was to investigate the effect of predictors such as symptoms, root apex development (closed versus open), and type of pulp capping material on the success rate of pulpotomy. Articles were searched using PubMed, Scopus, CENTRAL, and Web of Science databases, until January 2021. Outcomes were calculated by pooling the success rates with a random effect model. Comparison between the different subgroups was conducted using the z statistic test for proportion with significance set at alpha = 0.05. A total of 1,116 records were retrieved and 11 studies were included in the quantitative analysis. The pooled success rate for pulpotomy in teeth with irreversible pulpitis was 86% [95% CI: 0.76-0.92; I = 81.9%]. Additionally, prognostic indicators of success were evaluated. Stratification of teeth based on (1) symptoms demonstrated that teeth with symptomatic and asymptomatic irreversible pulpitis demonstrated success rate of 84% and 91% respectively, with no significant difference (p = 0.18) using z-score analysis; (2) open apex teeth demonstrated a significantly greater success rate (96%) compared to teeth with closed apex (83%) (p = 0.02), and (3) pulp capping materials demonstrated that Biodentine yielded significantly better success rates compared to Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA), calcium hydroxide, and Calcium Enriched Mixture (CEM.) Collectively, this is the first meta-analytical study to determine the clinical outcome of pulpotomy for carious teeth with irreversible pulpitis and it's predictors for success. Moreover, we identify the stage of root development and type of biomaterial as predictors for success of pulpotomy.
治疗计划是临床成功的关键。长期以来,被诊断为“不可逆转的牙髓炎”的恒牙被认为牙髓已经不可逆转地受损,无法修复,需要进行根管治疗。然而,一些较新的临床方法,如牙髓切断术,作为一种微创且基于生物学的方法,已经重新应用于治疗牙髓炎的牙齿。本研究的主要目的是进行荟萃分析,全面评估因龋源性牙髓暴露而导致不可逆转的牙髓炎的恒牙牙髓切断术的总体成功率。本研究的次要目的是研究预测因素,如症状、根尖发育(闭合或开放)以及牙髓盖髓材料的类型,对牙髓切断术成功率的影响。文章通过 PubMed、Scopus、CENTRAL 和 Web of Science 数据库进行搜索,直到 2021 年 1 月。使用随机效应模型汇总成功率。使用 z 统计量检验进行不同亚组之间的比较,显著性水平设置为α=0.05。共检索到 1116 条记录,其中 11 项研究纳入定量分析。不可逆转的牙髓炎恒牙牙髓切断术的总体成功率为 86%[95%CI:0.76-0.92;I=81.9%]。此外,还评估了成功的预测指标。根据(1)症状对牙齿进行分层,结果表明,有症状和无症状不可逆转牙髓炎的牙齿成功率分别为 84%和 91%,使用 z 分数分析,无显著差异(p=0.18);(2)根尖开放的牙齿与根尖闭合的牙齿相比,成功率显著更高(96%比 83%)(p=0.02);(3)牙髓盖髓材料表明,与三氧化矿物凝聚体(MTA)、氢氧化钙和钙强化混合剂(CEM)相比,Biodentine 显著提高了成功率。总的来说,这是第一项关于牙髓切断术治疗不可逆转的牙髓炎的临床结果及其成功预测因素的荟萃分析研究。此外,我们确定了根尖发育阶段和生物材料类型是牙髓切断术成功的预测因素。