Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2023 Jan;195:110147. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2022.110147. Epub 2022 Nov 14.
We conducted a randomized, crossover trial to compare intermittent-scanning continuous glucose monitoring (isCGM) device with structured education (Intervention) to self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) (Control) in the reduction of time below range.
This crossover trial involved 104 adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) using multiple daily injections. Participants were randomly allocated to either sequence Intervention/Control or sequence Control/Intervention. During the Intervention period which lasted 84 days, participants used the first-generation FreeStyle Libre (Abbott Diabetes Care, Alameda, CA, USA) and received structured education on how to prevent hypoglycemia based on the trend arrow and by frequent sensor scanning (≥10 times a day). Confirmatory SMBG was conducted before dosing insulin. The Control period lasted 84 days. The primary endpoint was the decrease in the time below range (TBR; <70 mg/dL).
The time below range was significantly reduced in the Intervention arm compared to the Control arm (2.42 ± 1.68 h/day [10.1 %±7.0 %] vs 3.10 ± 2.28 h/day [12.9 %±9.5 %], P = 0.012). The ratio of high-risk participants with low blood glucose index >5 was significantly reduced (8.6 % vs 23.7 %, P < 0.001).
The use of isCGM combined with structured education significantly reduced the time below range in patients with T1DM.
我们进行了一项随机、交叉试验,比较了间歇性扫描连续血糖监测(isCGM)设备与基于趋势箭头和频繁传感器扫描(每天≥10 次)的结构化教育(干预)对降低血糖不达标的时间。
这项交叉试验涉及 104 名使用多次每日注射的 1 型糖尿病患者。参与者被随机分配到干预/对照或对照/干预的顺序。在持续 84 天的干预期间,参与者使用第一代 FreeStyle Libre(雅培糖尿病护理,阿拉米达,CA,美国),并接受了关于如何预防低血糖的结构化教育。在胰岛素给药前进行确认性 SMBG。对照期持续 84 天。主要终点是血糖不达标的时间(TBR;<70mg/dL)减少。
与对照臂相比,干预臂的血糖不达标的时间明显减少(2.42±1.68h/天[10.1%±7.0%]与 3.10±2.28h/天[12.9%±9.5%],P=0.012)。低血糖指数>5 的高风险参与者比例显著降低(8.6%对 23.7%,P<0.001)。
使用 isCGM 联合结构化教育可显著降低 1 型糖尿病患者的血糖不达标的时间。