Suppr超能文献

富血小板血浆(PRP)与PRP微针治疗雄激素性脱发的疗效比较。

Comparison of Efficacy of Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) With PRP Microneedling in Androgenetic Alopecia.

作者信息

Muhammad Anjum, Iftikhar Nadia, Mashhood Asher, Saleem Zulqurnain, Sundus Madhia, Khalid Abrar A, Khan Shumaila, Naveed Safoora, Shahid Waseem, Ajmal Umair, Akbar Afnan

机构信息

Dermatology, Pak Emirates Military Hospital, Rawalpindi, PAK.

Medicine, Pak Emirates Military Hospital, Rawalpindi, PAK.

出版信息

Cureus. 2022 Oct 18;14(10):e30418. doi: 10.7759/cureus.30418. eCollection 2022 Oct.

Abstract

Background Limited data are available on the efficacy of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and microneedling versus PRP alone. In this study, we aimed to compare the efficacy of PRP and microneedling with PRP alone in androgenetic alopecia (AGA). Methodology This prospective, randomized, interventional study was conducted in Pak-Emirates Military Hospital, Rawalpindi, from September 2020 to December 2020. In total, 60 individuals suffering from AGA of up to Hamilton-Norwood grade 4 were randomly assigned to two groups, namely, PRP+microneedling versus PRP alone. A total of three sessions, each one month apart, were offered. Pre and post-intervention photographs, hair count (/cm), hair-pull test, and physician's and patient's perception of hair loss were recorded. The data were statistically analyzed. Results A greater proportion of patients in the microneedling group achieved a negative hair-pull test and improved perception of hair loss compared to the PRP-alone group (82.1% vs. 51.9% and 88.0% vs. 73.9%, respectively). The percentage increase in mean hair count in the microneedling group (24.53 ± 9.49%) was significantly higher than the increase in the PRP-alone group (17.88 ± 10.15%) (p = 0.011). For grades 2 and 3 hair loss, microneedling+PRP caused a much greater increase in hair count than PRP alone. This difference was less pronounced for Norwood grade 4. No notable side effects were noted in any patient. Conclusions Combined PRP and microneedling is more efficacious than PRP alone in patients with AGA up to Hamilton-Norwood grade 4.

摘要

背景

关于富血小板血浆(PRP)联合微针治疗与单纯PRP治疗效果的可用数据有限。在本研究中,我们旨在比较PRP联合微针治疗与单纯PRP治疗雄激素性脱发(AGA)的效果。

方法

本前瞻性、随机、干预性研究于2020年9月至2020年12月在拉瓦尔品第的巴基斯坦 - 阿联酋军事医院进行。总共60例汉密尔顿 - 诺伍德分级达4级的AGA患者被随机分为两组,即PRP联合微针治疗组与单纯PRP治疗组。共进行三次治疗,每次间隔一个月。记录干预前后的照片、每厘米头发计数、拔发试验以及医生和患者对脱发的感知。对数据进行统计学分析。

结果

与单纯PRP治疗组相比,微针治疗组中更多比例的患者拔发试验结果为阴性且脱发感知得到改善(分别为82.1%对51.9%和88.0%对73.9%)。微针治疗组平均头发计数的百分比增加(24.53±9.49%)显著高于单纯PRP治疗组(17.88±10.15%)(p = 0.011)。对于2级和3级脱发,微针联合PRP治疗导致的头发计数增加比单纯PRP治疗大得多。对于诺伍德4级,这种差异不太明显。未在任何患者中观察到明显的副作用。

结论

在汉密尔顿 - 诺伍德分级达4级的AGA患者中,PRP联合微针治疗比单纯PRP治疗更有效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5b0/9670661/bd99d9e1e1c2/cureus-0014-00000030418-i01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验