Cavaggioni Luca, Gilardini Luisa, Redaelli Gabriella, Croci Marina, Cancello Raffaella, Capodaglio Paolo, Bruno Amalia, Bertoli Simona
Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20129 Milan, Italy.
Obesity Unit and Laboratory of Nutrition and Obesity Research, Department of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases, IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, 20145 Milan, Italy.
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Nov 17;10(11):2306. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10112306.
This pilot study compared the effects of two attentional focus strategies on fitness parameters and body composition in outpatients with obesity. This was a randomized, controlled study that enrolled 94 obese individuals and allocated them into an internal focus group (IF) or an external focus group (EF) while performing six weeks of a home-based training program. The home-based exercise program was the same for both groups except for the instructions that shifted the attention to an external or an internal condition. At the beginning and after the intervention period, participants were assessed for functional performance using the Functional Movement Screen (FMS), body balance using the Modified Balance Error Scoring System (M-BESS) and muscular strength with the Handgrip Strength Test (HST) and the Five-Repetition Sit-To-Stand (FRSTS) test. Concerning body composition and anthropometric parameters, the body mass index (BMI) and fat mass percentage (FM%) were calculated. Significant improvements, main interactions and effects of time and groups were highlighted in the EF group as compared to the IF group in FMS (35% vs. 21%), M-BESS (42% vs. 18%), HST (13% vs. 7%) and FRSTS (23% vs. 12%) measures, while FM% (5%) and BMI (6% vs. 5%) showed a similar improvement overtime (p < 0.001). In conclusion, our findings provide initial evidence that a 6-week training program performed following external focus instruction is able to promote significant enhancements in movement efficiency, balance and muscular strength as compared to an internal focus cue. Fitness coaches and therapists might consider integrating a specific attentional focus strategy when designing rehabilitation programs in subjects with obesity.
这项初步研究比较了两种注意力聚焦策略对肥胖门诊患者健康参数和身体成分的影响。这是一项随机对照研究,招募了94名肥胖个体,在他们进行为期六周的居家训练计划时,将他们分配到内部聚焦组(IF)或外部聚焦组(EF)。除了将注意力转移到外部或内部状况的指导语外,两组的居家锻炼计划相同。在干预期开始时和结束后,使用功能性动作筛查(FMS)评估参与者的功能表现,使用改良版平衡误差评分系统(M-BESS)评估身体平衡,使用握力测试(HST)和五次重复坐立测试(FRSTS)评估肌肉力量。关于身体成分和人体测量参数,计算了体重指数(BMI)和体脂百分比(FM%)。与IF组相比,EF组在FMS(35%对21%)、M-BESS(42%对18%)、HST(13%对7%)和FRSTS(23%对12%)测量中,时间和组别的显著改善、主要交互作用和效应更为突出,而FM%(5%)和BMI(6%对5%)随时间的改善相似(p<0.001)。总之,我们的研究结果提供了初步证据,即与内部聚焦提示相比,按照外部聚焦指导进行的为期6周的训练计划能够显著提高运动效率、平衡和肌肉力量。健身教练和治疗师在为肥胖患者设计康复计划时,可能会考虑纳入特定的注意力聚焦策略。