Melbourne Brain Centre, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia,
Ministry of Health Malaysia, Putrajaya, Malaysia,
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2023;52(3):353-362. doi: 10.1159/000526873. Epub 2022 Nov 24.
Extensive randomized controlled clinical trials for endovascular thrombectomy in anterior circulation large vessel occlusions (internal carotid arteries and M1 segment of middle cerebral arteries) have been published over the past decade, but there have not been randomized controlled trials for distal arterial occlusions to date. Distal arterial occlusion randomized controlled trials are essential to decide on patient selection, imaging criteria, and endovascular approach to improve the outcome and reduce complications.
The definition of distal arterial occlusion is however unclear, and we believe that a uniform nomenclature of distal arterial occlusions is essential for the design of robust randomized controlled studies. We undertook a systematic literature review and comprehensive analysis of 70 articles looking at distal arterial occlusions and previous attempts at classifying them as well as comparing their similarities and differences with a more selective look at the middle cerebral artery. Thirty-two articles were finally deemed suitable and included for this review. In this review article, we present 3 disparate classifications of distal arterial occlusions, namely, classical/anatomical, functional/imaging, and structural/calibre, and compare the similarities and differences between them.
We propose the adoption of functional/imaging classification to guide the identification of distal arterial occlusions with the M2 segment starting at the point of bifurcation of the middle cerebral artery trunk/M1 segment. With regards to the anterior temporal artery, we propose that it will be considered a branch of the M1 and only be considered as the M2 segment if it is a holo-temporal artery. We believe that this is a practical method of classification in the time-critical decision-making period.
过去十年已经发表了大量关于血管内血栓切除术治疗前循环大血管闭塞(颈内动脉和大脑中动脉 M1 段)的广泛随机对照临床试验,但迄今为止还没有关于远端动脉闭塞的随机对照试验。远端动脉闭塞的随机对照试验对于确定患者选择、影像学标准和血管内治疗方法至关重要,以改善结果并减少并发症。
然而,远端动脉闭塞的定义尚不清楚,我们认为统一的远端动脉闭塞命名法对于设计稳健的随机对照研究至关重要。我们进行了系统的文献回顾和综合分析,共分析了 70 篇关于远端动脉闭塞的文章,以及之前对其进行分类的尝试,并与更选择性地观察大脑中动脉进行了比较,以分析其异同。最后,有 32 篇文章被认为适合并包括在本综述中。在这篇综述文章中,我们提出了 3 种不同的远端动脉闭塞分类,即经典/解剖学、功能/影像学和结构/口径,并比较了它们之间的异同。
我们建议采用功能/影像学分类来指导识别从大脑中动脉主干/ M1 段分叉处开始的 M2 段的远端动脉闭塞。关于颞前动脉,我们建议将其视为 M1 的分支,如果它是全颞动脉,则仅将其视为 M2 段。我们认为,这是在时间关键的决策期间进行分类的一种实用方法。