Fluhrer Hannah, Hutterer Georg C, Golbeck Sylvia, Stidl Michael, Niedrist Tobias, Pichler Renate, Mischinger Johannes, Seles Maximilian, Mannweiler Sebastian, Spiegelberg Jasmin, Bauernhofer Thomas, Jost Philipp J, Ahyai Sascha, Zigeuner Richard, Pichler Martin, Barth Dominik A
Division of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2022 Nov 19;14:17588359221134065. doi: 10.1177/17588359221134065. eCollection 2022.
The treatment landscape of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has substantially advanced over the last three decades, whereby data from controlled clinical trials indicate significant improvements regarding patients' overall survival (OS) in highly selected patient cohorts. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of potentially game changing drugs on patients' outcomes by comparing three different historical mRCC treatment eras.
In all, 914 mRCC patients who were diagnosed between July 1985 and September 2020 were included into this observational study and assigned to three different treatment eras ['cytokine', 'first-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs)', and 'modern TKIs/immunotherapy'] based on the EMA approval dates of sunitinib (July 2006) and nivolumab (June 2015) in mRCC treatment. OS was considered the primary study endpoint. Kaplan-Meier analyses, log-rank tests, and uni- and multivariable Cox regression models were performed.
OS was significantly longer in patients of the modern TKIs/immunotherapy era (median OS not reached) as compared to the cytokine (2.4 years) and first-generation TKIs era (1.7 years, all < 0.001). Moreover, patients of the modern TKIs/immunotherapy era demonstrated a significantly better prognosis [hazard ratio (HR): 0.41, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.32-0.55, < 0.001] compared to those of the cytokine era, while no statistically significant difference was observed between the cytokine and the first-generation TKIs era cohort (HR: 1.12, 95% CI: 0.89-1.41, = 0.341). Subgroup analyses stratified by the International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) risk groups showed a significantly longer OS in the modern TKIs/immunotherapy era as compared to first-generation TKIs and cytokines across all IMDC risk groups.
Significant advances in the systemic medical treatment of mRCC during the recent decade and the introduction of immunotherapy exerted a major impact on patient outcomes in terms of OS in a real-life population.
在过去三十年中,转移性肾细胞癌(mRCC)的治疗格局有了显著进展,来自对照临床试验的数据表明,在高度选择的患者队列中,患者的总生存期(OS)有了显著改善。本研究的目的是通过比较三个不同的mRCC历史治疗时代,评估可能改变治疗格局的药物对患者预后的影响。
总共914例在1985年7月至2020年9月期间被诊断为mRCC的患者被纳入本观察性研究,并根据舒尼替尼(2006年7月)和纳武单抗(2015年6月)在mRCC治疗中的欧洲药品管理局(EMA)批准日期,分为三个不同的治疗时代['细胞因子'、'第一代酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKIs)'和'现代TKIs/免疫疗法']。OS被视为主要研究终点。进行了Kaplan-Meier分析、对数秩检验以及单变量和多变量Cox回归模型分析。
与细胞因子治疗时代(2.4年)和第一代TKIs治疗时代(1.7年,均P<0.001)相比,现代TKIs/免疫疗法时代的患者OS显著更长(中位OS未达到)。此外,与细胞因子治疗时代相比,现代TKIs/免疫疗法时代的患者预后显著更好[风险比(HR):0.41,95%置信区间(CI):0.32-0.55,P<0.001],而细胞因子治疗时代和第一代TKIs治疗时代的队列之间未观察到统计学显著差异(HR:1.12,95%CI:0.89-1.41,P = 0.341)。根据国际转移性肾细胞癌数据库联盟(IMDC)风险组进行的亚组分析显示,在现代TKIs/免疫疗法时代,所有IMDC风险组的OS均显著长于第一代TKIs和细胞因子治疗时代。
近十年来mRCC全身药物治疗的显著进展以及免疫疗法的引入,对现实生活人群中患者的OS结局产生了重大影响。