Suppr超能文献

共聚焦激光显微镜在根治性前列腺切除术中评估手术切缘的应用。

Confocal laser microscopy for assessment of surgical margins during radical prostatectomy.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Prosper Prostate Cancer Clinics, Nijmegen, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BJU Int. 2023 Jul;132(1):40-46. doi: 10.1111/bju.15938. Epub 2022 Dec 18.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the feasibility of confocal laser microscopy (CLM) for intraoperative margin assessment as faster alternative to neurovascular structure-adjacent frozen-section examination (NeuroSAFE) during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Surgical margins were assessed during 50 RARP procedures in patients scheduled for NeuroSAFE. Posterolateral sections were cut and imaged with CLM and further processed to conform with the NeuroSAFE protocol. Secondary resection (SR) was performed in case a positive surgical margin (PSM) was observed with NeuroSAFE. Afterwards, the CLM images were non-blinded assessed for the presence of PSMs. The accuracy of both NeuroSAFE and CLM was compared with conventional histopathology. Agreement for detection of PSMs between NeuroSAFE and CLM was evaluated with Cohen's kappa coefficient. Procedure times were compared with a Wilcoxon signed-ranks test.

RESULTS

In total, 96 posterolateral sections of RP specimens were evaluated for the presence of PSMs. CLM identified 15 (16%) PSMs and NeuroSAFE identified 14 (15%) PSMs. CLM had a calculated sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of 86%, 96%, 80% and 98% respectively for the detection of PSMs compared to definite pathology. After SR, residual tumour was found in six of 13 cases (46%), which were all identified by both techniques. There was a substantial level of agreement between CLM and NeuroSAFE (κ = 0.80). The median procedure time for CLM was significantly shorter compared to NeuroSAFE (8 vs 50 min, P < 0.001). The main limitation of this study was the non-blinded assessment of the CLM images.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to NeuroSAFE, CLM is a promising technique for intraoperative margin assessment and is able to reduce the time of intraoperative margin assessment.

摘要

目的

评估共聚焦激光显微镜(CLM)在机器人辅助前列腺根治性切除术(RARP)中作为神经血管结构毗邻冷冻切片检查(NeuroSAFE)的更快替代方法进行术中切缘评估的可行性。

患者与方法

在计划进行 NeuroSAFE 的 50 例 RARP 手术患者中,评估了手术切缘。对后外侧切片进行切割和 CLM 成像,并进一步处理以符合 NeuroSAFE 方案。如果在 NeuroSAFE 中观察到阳性手术切缘(PSM),则进行二次切除(SR)。之后,对 CLM 图像进行非盲评估以检测 PSM 的存在。比较了 NeuroSAFE 和 CLM 的准确性与常规组织病理学。使用 Cohen's kappa 系数评估 NeuroSAFE 和 CLM 检测 PSM 的一致性。使用 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验比较了两种方法的程序时间。

结果

共评估了 96 例 RP 标本的后外侧切片是否存在 PSM。CLM 检出 15 例(16%)PSM,NeuroSAFE 检出 14 例(15%)PSM。CLM 检测 PSM 的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为 86%、96%、80%和 98%,与明确的病理学相比。在 SR 后,13 例中有 6 例(46%)发现残留肿瘤,这两种技术均能识别。CLM 和 NeuroSAFE 之间存在显著的一致性(κ=0.80)。与 NeuroSAFE 相比,CLM 的程序时间明显更短(8 分钟 vs 50 分钟,P<0.001)。本研究的主要局限性是对 CLM 图像进行非盲评估。

结论

与 NeuroSAFE 相比,CLM 是一种有前途的术中切缘评估技术,能够缩短术中切缘评估的时间。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验