Graduate School, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China.
Zhanjiang First Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Zhanjiang, China.
Orthop Surg. 2023 Jan;15(1):247-255. doi: 10.1111/os.13569. Epub 2022 Nov 29.
Ankle fractures are often combined with syndesmotic instability, requiring reduction and stabilization. However, the optimal level for syndesmotic screw positioning remains unclear. This study aims to evaluate the effect of different syndesmotic screw insertion levels on postoperative clinical outcomes and determine whether an optimal level exists.
This retrospective study included data from 43 adult patients with acute closed ankle fractures combined with intraoperative evidence of unstable syndesmotic injuries who underwent open reduction internal fixation from January 1, 2017 to March 1, 2018 according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. All 43 patients were divided into three groups based on the syndesmotic screw placement level: trans-syndesmotic group: screw level of 2-3 cm; inferior-syndesmotic group: screw level <2 cm; and supra-syndesmotic group: screw level >3 cm. Clinical outcomes were measured at the final follow-up, including the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score, Olerud-Molander Ankle Score (OMAS), short-form 36-item questionnaire (SF-36), visual analogue scale (VAS) score and restrictions in ankle range of motion (ROM). The relationships between screw placement level and clinical outcomes were analyzed with the Kruskal-Wallis H-test and Spearman correlation analysis.
The median follow-up duration was 15 months (range, 10-22 months). No patients developed fracture nonunion or malunion or experienced hardware failure. The outcome scoring systems showed an overall score for the entire group of 94.91 points for the AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score, 83.14 for the OMAS, 96.65 for the SF-36, 1.77 for the VAS, 9.14° for the restrictions in dorsiflexion, and 1.30° for the restrictions in plantarflexion. There were no significant differences among three groups in clinical outcomes (P > 0.05). Neither the AOFAS score nor OMAS had significant correlations with screw insertion level (P = 0.825 and P = 0.585, respectively). No postoperative arthritis or widening of the tibiofibular space was observed at the final follow-up.
Different syndesmotic screw placement levels appear not to affect the clinical outcomes of ankle fractures with syndesmotic instability. No optimal level was observed in this study. Our findings suggest other clinically acceptable options apart from syndesmotic screw placement 2-3 cm above the ankle.
踝关节骨折常合并下胫腓联合不稳定,需要复位和固定。然而,下胫腓螺钉固定的最佳位置仍不清楚。本研究旨在评估不同下胫腓螺钉置入水平对术后临床结果的影响,并确定是否存在最佳水平。
这是一项回顾性研究,纳入了 2017 年 1 月 1 日至 2018 年 3 月 1 日根据纳入和排除标准接受切开复位内固定的 43 例急性闭合性踝关节骨折合并术中下胫腓联合不稳定的成年患者的临床资料。所有 43 例患者根据下胫腓螺钉放置水平分为三组:经下胫腓螺钉组:螺钉水平 2-3cm;下胫腓螺钉组:螺钉水平<2cm;下胫腓螺钉组:螺钉水平>3cm。最终随访时测量临床结果,包括美国矫形足踝协会(AOFAS)踝后足评分、Olerud-Molander 踝关节评分(OMAS)、简化 36 项健康调查问卷(SF-36)、视觉模拟评分(VAS)和踝关节活动范围(ROM)受限。采用 Kruskal-Wallis H 检验和 Spearman 相关分析评估螺钉放置水平与临床结果的关系。
中位随访时间为 15 个月(10-22 个月)。无患者发生骨折不愈合或畸形愈合,无内固定失败。评分系统显示,AOFAS 踝后足评分、OMAS、SF-36、VAS、背屈受限和跖屈受限的总分分别为 94.91 分、83.14 分、96.65 分、1.77 分、9.14°和 1.30°。三组患者的临床结果无显著差异(P>0.05)。AOFAS 评分和 OMAS 均与螺钉置入水平无显著相关性(P=0.825 和 P=0.585)。末次随访时,无术后关节炎或胫腓骨间隙增宽。
不同的下胫腓螺钉固定水平似乎不会影响下胫腓联合不稳定的踝关节骨折的临床结果。本研究未观察到最佳水平。我们的研究结果表明,除了在踝关节上方 2-3cm 处放置下胫腓螺钉外,还有其他临床上可接受的选择。