Devorski Luk, Skibski Andrew, Mangum L Colby
Rehabilitation, Athletic Assessment, and Dynamic Imaging (READY) Laboratory, Institute of Exercise Physiology and Rehabilitation Science, University of Central Florida, 4364 Scorpius Street, HS 2 Room 235, Orlando, FL, 32816-2205, USA.
J Ultrasound. 2024 Mar;27(1):21-29. doi: 10.1007/s40477-022-00750-8. Epub 2022 Dec 1.
The plank is a common exercise used to evaluate core function. Surface electromyography (sEMG) and ultrasound can be used simultaneously to measure muscle activity. We aimed to compare the %-thickness and %-activation during the plank performed on three surfaces and to determine agreement and relationship between rectus abdominis (RA) %-thickness of a rested tabletop position and %-activation normalized to quiet tabletop position during the plank on three surfaces.
In this cross-sectional study, ultrasound and sEMG measured RA muscle function during the first 5-s and last 5-s of a plank performed on a table, yoga mat, and fitness ball. A repeated measures ANOVA compared differences in %-thickness change and Friedman's tests compared differences in %-activation, alpha set a priori p ≤ 0.05. Bland-Altman plots measured agreement between instruments. Spearman's rho determined relationships between instruments.
There was no difference between %-thickness change across surfaces during the first 5-s or last 5-s, or between %-activation during the last 5-s. The %-activation of the RA during the first 5-s performed on the fitness ball was higher than the table and yoga mat (p < 0.001). Ultrasound and sEMG had weak relationships across all surfaces (ρ = - 0.078 to 0.116).
The first 5-s of the plank performed on the fitness ball requires a greater RA activation. Ultrasound could not detect changes in %-thickness of the RA during the plank which may be influenced by the type of contraction. Comparison between these measurement tools during isometric exercise should be used with caution.
平板支撑是一种用于评估核心功能的常见运动。表面肌电图(sEMG)和超声可同时用于测量肌肉活动。我们旨在比较在三种表面上进行平板支撑时的厚度百分比和激活百分比,并确定在三种表面上进行平板支撑时,腹直肌(RA)在静止桌面位置的厚度百分比与相对于安静桌面位置归一化的激活百分比之间的一致性和关系。
在这项横断面研究中,超声和sEMG在平板支撑的前5秒和后5秒测量了在桌子、瑜伽垫和健身球上进行平板支撑时的RA肌肉功能。重复测量方差分析比较厚度百分比变化的差异,Friedman检验比较激活百分比的差异,预先设定的α值p≤0.05。Bland-Altman图测量仪器之间的一致性。Spearman相关系数确定仪器之间的关系。
在前5秒或后5秒,不同表面之间的厚度百分比变化没有差异,在后5秒的激活百分比之间也没有差异。在健身球上进行平板支撑的前5秒,RA的激活百分比高于在桌子和瑜伽垫上(p<0.001)。超声和sEMG在所有表面上的关系都很弱(ρ=-0.078至0.116)。
在健身球上进行平板支撑的前5秒需要更大的RA激活。超声无法检测到平板支撑期间RA厚度百分比的变化,这可能受收缩类型的影响。在等长运动期间比较这些测量工具时应谨慎使用。