Department of Geosciences, Applied Mineralogy, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Department of Geosciences, Prehistory and Quaternary Ecology, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 2;17(12):e0278643. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278643. eCollection 2022.
We propose a quantitative framework for understanding the knapping force requirements imposed by different raw materials in their unheated and heat-treated states. Our model interprets stone tool knapping as being the result of cracks formed during the first impact with a hammer stone, followed by continued stressing of these cracks that eventually leads to flake detachment. We combine bending strength, indentation fracture resistance and "Griffith" crack lengths of flint and silcrete to obtain functions identifying critical forces for flaking without or after heat treatment. We argue that these forces are a key factor for understanding the "knappability" of different raw materials, because only forces with 100N or less can be used for very precise strike control. Our model explains for the first time why experimental knappers frequently observe that flint (a stronger material, which, in our case, has a strength above 100 MPa) is easier to knap than silcretes (which is relatively weaker with strength values at or below 60 MPa). Our findings allow for understanding the differences between heat-treated and untreated flint and silcrete in terms of knapping quality, and they allow to compare the qualities of different raw materials.
我们提出了一个定量框架,用于理解不同原材料在未经加热和热处理状态下所需的破碎力。我们的模型将石器的破碎解释为锤子第一次撞击时形成的裂缝,然后继续对这些裂缝施加压力,最终导致剥落。我们结合了燧石和硅质岩的弯曲强度、压痕断裂阻力和“格里菲斯”裂纹长度,得出了在未经热处理或热处理后确定剥落临界力的函数。我们认为,这些力是理解不同原材料“可破碎性”的关键因素,因为只有 100N 或更小的力才能用于非常精确的打击控制。我们的模型首次解释了为什么实验石器制造者经常观察到燧石(一种强度更高的材料,在我们的案例中,强度超过 100MPa)比硅质岩(相对较弱,强度值在 60MPa 或以下)更容易破碎。我们的发现允许从破碎质量的角度理解热处理和未处理的燧石和硅质岩之间的差异,并允许比较不同原材料的质量。