Mitchell Chelsea J, Jayakaran Anand D, McIntyre Jenifer K
Washington State University-Puyallup, 2606 W Pioneer Ave, Puyallup, WA, 98371, USA.
Washington State University-Puyallup, 2606 W Pioneer Ave, Puyallup, WA, 98371, USA.
J Environ Manage. 2023 Feb 1;327:116915. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116915. Epub 2022 Nov 30.
Bioretention has been widely used to mitigate hydrologic impacts of stormwater runoff and is increasingly being relied upon to treat chemical and biological pollutants transported by stormwater. Despite this reliance, we still lack an understanding of treatment performance for certain organic and biological contaminants which may interact with biotic and abiotic components of bioretention systems. We evaluated the treatment of fecal indicator bacteria (FIB) and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in stormwater runoff by bioretention. We compared treatment performance by Washington's standard bioretention mix of 60% sand: 40% compost (by volume), and by three other mixtures amended with biochar, fungi (Stropharia rugosoannulata), or both. All bioretention columns were conditioned with clean water and then dosed with collected roadway runoff at a rate equivalent to a 6 month, 24 h storm in this region during 8 events over a 14-month period. Effluents for each column were analyzed for 23 PAHs, Escherichia coli, fecal coliform, dissolved organic carbon (DOC), and total suspended solids (TSS). The fate and transport of PAHs within the bioretention columns was tracked by measuring soil PAHs in media cores taken from the columns. ΣPAH were almost completely removed by all treatments across all storms, with removal rates ranging from 97 to 100% for 94 out of 96 samples. Compost appeared to be a source of PAHs in bioretention media, as biochar-amended media initially contained half the ΣPAHs as treatments with the standard 60:40 sand:compost mixture. We observed a net loss of ΣPAHs (19-73%) in bioretention media across the study, which could not be explained by PAHs in the effluent, suggesting that bioremediation by microbes and/or plants attenuated media PAHs. E. coli and fecal coliform were exported in the first dosing event, but all columns achieved some treatment in subsequent dosing events. Overall, these findings suggest that PAHs in stormwater can be remediated with bioretention, are unlikely to accumulate in bioretention media, and that biochar amendments can improve the treatment of E. coli.
生物滞留已被广泛用于减轻雨水径流的水文影响,并且越来越多地被用于处理雨水中携带的化学和生物污染物。尽管有这种依赖,但我们仍然缺乏对某些有机和生物污染物处理性能的了解,这些污染物可能与生物滞留系统的生物和非生物成分相互作用。我们评估了生物滞留对雨水径流中粪便指示菌(FIB)和多环芳烃(PAHs)的处理效果。我们比较了华盛顿州标准的60%沙子:40%堆肥(按体积计)生物滞留混合物以及另外三种用生物炭、真菌(皱环盖菇)或两者改良的混合物的处理性能。所有生物滞留柱先用清水进行预处理,然后在14个月内的8次事件中,以相当于该地区6个月、24小时暴雨的速率加入收集的道路径流。对每个柱的流出物分析了23种多环芳烃、大肠杆菌、粪大肠菌群、溶解有机碳(DOC)和总悬浮固体(TSS)。通过测量从柱中取出的介质芯中的土壤多环芳烃来追踪多环芳烃在生物滞留柱内的归宿和迁移。在所有风暴的所有处理中,ΣPAH几乎被完全去除,96个样本中有94个的去除率在97%至100%之间。堆肥似乎是生物滞留介质中多环芳烃的一个来源,因为用生物炭改良的介质最初含有的ΣPAH是标准60:40沙子:堆肥混合物处理的一半。在整个研究过程中,我们观察到生物滞留介质中ΣPAH有净损失(19% - 73%),这无法用流出物中的多环芳烃来解释,表明微生物和/或植物的生物修复作用减弱了介质中的多环芳烃。大肠杆菌和粪大肠菌群在第一次加药事件中就被排出,但在随后的加药事件中所有柱都实现了一定程度的处理。总体而言,这些发现表明雨水中的多环芳烃可以通过生物滞留进行修复,不太可能在生物滞留介质中积累,并且生物炭改良可以改善对大肠杆菌的处理。