Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Washington University in Saint Louis School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Brown School of Social Work and Public Health, Washington University in Saint Louis, Saint Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Trials. 2022 Dec 5;23(1):975. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06916-3.
While inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are considered the essential foundation of most asthma therapy, ICS inhaler nonadherence is a notoriously common problem and a significant cause of asthma-related morbidity. Partially acknowledging the problem of nonadherence, international organizations recently made paradigm-shifting recommendations that all patients with mild-to-moderate persistent asthma be considered for symptom-driven ICS-containing inhalers rather than relying on adherence to traditional maintenance ICS inhalers and symptom-driven short-acting beta-agonists (SABA). With this new approach, asthma patients are at least exposed to the important anti-inflammatory effects of ICS-containing inhalers when their symptom reliever inhaler is deployed due to acute symptoms.
This study will (Part 1) complete a pragmatic randomized controlled trial to evaluate if an inhaler strategy that utilizes symptom-driven ICS inhalers is particularly beneficial in maintenance ICS inhaler non-adherent asthma patients, and (Part 2) use a dissemination and implementation (D&I) science conceptual framework to better understand patients' and providers' views of inhaler nonadherence. This study, which will have an option of taking place entirely remotely, will use a Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved electronic sensor (Hailie® sensor) to monitor inhaler adherence and includes semi-structured interviews guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).
This study is assessing the problem of nonadherence using a D&I implementation science research lens while testing a new inhaler approach to potentially ameliorate the detrimental consequences of maintenance inhaler nonadherence. We hypothesize that the use of a symptom-driven ICS/LABA management strategy, as compared to traditional maintenance ICS treatment and symptom-driven SABA, will lead to improved adherence to an asthma treatment strategy, decreased asthma-related morbidity, less cumulative ICS exposure, and greater patient satisfaction with an inhaler approach.
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05111262. Registered on November 8, 2021.
尽管吸入性皮质类固醇(ICS)被认为是大多数哮喘治疗的基础,但 ICS 吸入器不依从是一个众所周知的常见问题,也是与哮喘相关发病率的主要原因。国际组织部分意识到不依从的问题,最近提出了具有划时代意义的建议,即所有轻度至中度持续性哮喘患者都应考虑使用基于症状的含 ICS 吸入器,而不是依赖于坚持使用传统的维持性 ICS 吸入器和基于症状的短效β激动剂(SABA)。通过这种新方法,当哮喘患者因急性症状而使用症状缓解吸入器时,他们至少会接触到含有 ICS 的吸入器的重要抗炎作用。
本研究将(第 1 部分)完成一项实用随机对照试验,以评估基于症状的 ICS 吸入器的吸入器策略是否对维持性 ICS 吸入器不依从的哮喘患者特别有益,以及(第 2 部分)使用传播和实施(D&I)科学概念框架更好地了解患者和提供者对吸入器不依从的看法。这项研究可以选择完全远程进行,将使用食品和药物管理局(FDA)批准的电子传感器(Hailie®传感器)来监测吸入器的依从性,并包括由综合实施研究框架(CFIR)指导的半结构化访谈。
本研究通过实施科学研究的 D&I 视角来评估不依从的问题,同时测试一种新的吸入器方法,以潜在改善维持性吸入器不依从的不良后果。我们假设与传统的维持性 ICS 治疗和基于症状的 SABA 相比,使用基于症状的 ICS/LABA 管理策略将导致改善对哮喘治疗策略的依从性,降低哮喘相关发病率,减少累积 ICS 暴露,以及提高患者对吸入器方法的满意度。
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05111262。于 2021 年 11 月 8 日注册。