Syracuse University, USA.
University of Cincinnati, USA.
J Interpers Violence. 2023 May;38(9-10):6723-6750. doi: 10.1177/08862605221137711. Epub 2022 Dec 6.
Sexual and gender minority adolescents and young adults assigned female at birth (SGM-AFAB) report high rates of intimate partner violence (IPV) victimization. Despite adverse health outcomes of IPV, many survivors, particularly SGM-AFAB, do not seek help. This study (1) examined the proportion of SGM-AFAB who reported severe IPV victimization who sought help; (2) elucidated patterns of help-seeking facilitators and barriers; and (3) identified associations between sociodemographic characteristics, IPV victimization types, and minority stressors and latent classes of help-seeking facilitators and barriers. Participants included 193 SGM-AFAB (Mage = 20.6, SD = 3.4; 65.8% non-monosexual; 73.1% cisgender; 72.5% racial/ethnic minority; 16.6% annual household income $20,000 or less). Most participants who experienced severe IPV did not seek help (62.2%). Having a person or provider who was aware of the participant's abusive relationship was the most common reason for seeking help (50; 68.5%). Minimizing IPV was the most common reason for not seeking help (103; 87.3%). Fewer than 5% of SGM-AFAB who experienced severe IPV and who did not seek help reported SGM-specific help-seeking barriers, including not wanting to contribute to negative perceptions of the LGBTQ community, not disclosing their SGM status, and perceiving a lack of tailored services. Help-seeking facilitators and barriers varied by sociodemographic characteristics. Three classes of help-seeking facilitators and two classes of help-seeking barriers emerged. SGM-AFAB subgroups based on sexual and gender identity, recent coercive control, and identity as IPV victims differed in latent classes. This study's findings confirm SGM-AFAB IPV survivors' low likelihood of seeking help. Our results also underscore the importance of continuing to bolster SGM-AFAB survivors' access to trauma-informed, culturally sensitive, and affirming support. Further, multilevel prevention and intervention efforts are needed to reduce minimization of abuse and anticipatory judgment and blame among SGM-AFAB who hold multiple marginalized identities, experience coercive control, and identify as IPV victims.
出生时被指定为女性的性少数群体青少年和年轻成年人(SGM-AFAB)报告说,他们遭受亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)的发生率很高。尽管 IPV 会带来不良的健康后果,但许多幸存者,特别是 SGM-AFAB,并没有寻求帮助。本研究:(1) 检查了报告遭受严重 IPV 侵害并寻求帮助的 SGM-AFAB 的比例;(2) 阐明了寻求帮助的促进因素和障碍的模式;(3) 确定了社会人口特征、IPV 受害类型以及少数群体压力源与寻求帮助的促进因素和障碍的潜在类别之间的关联。参与者包括 193 名 SGM-AFAB(Mage = 20.6,SD = 3.4;65.8%非双性恋;73.1%顺性别;72.5%种族/族裔少数群体;16.6%家庭年收入 20,000 美元或以下)。大多数经历过严重 IPV 的参与者没有寻求帮助(62.2%)。有一个知道参与者受虐待关系的人或提供者是寻求帮助的最常见原因(50;68.5%)。最小化 IPV 是不寻求帮助的最常见原因(103;87.3%)。经历过严重 IPV 且未寻求帮助的 SGM-AFAB 中,不到 5%的人报告了 SGM 特定的寻求帮助障碍,包括不想助长对 LGBTQ 群体的负面看法、不透露自己的 SGM 身份以及认为缺乏量身定制的服务。寻求帮助的促进因素和障碍因社会人口特征而异。出现了三类寻求帮助的促进因素和两类寻求帮助的障碍。基于性和性别认同、最近的强制性控制以及作为 IPV 受害者的身份,SGM-AFAB 亚组在潜在类别上有所不同。本研究的结果证实了 SGM-AFAB IPV 幸存者寻求帮助的可能性较低。我们的研究结果还强调了继续增强 SGM-AFAB 幸存者获得创伤知情、文化敏感和支持的重要性。此外,需要采取多层次的预防和干预措施,以减少对虐待的最小化以及对具有多种边缘化身份、经历强制性控制和认同为 IPV 受害者的 SGM-AFAB 的预期判断和指责。