Rodrigues Bruno, Encantado Jorge, Carraça Eliana, Martins João, Marques Adilson, Lopes Luís, Sousa-Sá Eduarda, Cliff Dylan, Mendes Romeu, Santos Rute
Faculty of Sport, Research Centre in Physical Activity, Health and Leisure, University of Porto, Porto,Portugal.
CIPER, Faculdade de Motricidade Humana, Lisboa,Portugal.
J Phys Act Health. 2022 Dec 6;20(1):50-76. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2022-0399. Print 2023 Jan 1.
We aim to systematically review the literature on measurement properties of self- and proxy-reported questionnaires measuring 24-hour movement behaviors in children and adolescents.
PubMed, PsycINFO, SPORTDiscus, and EMBASE were searched until June 2021. Studies were included if the sample size for validity studies had 50 participants (minimum) and included, at least, both validity and test-retest reliability results of questionnaires. The review followed an adaptation of the Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments guidelines, to evaluate the quality of measurements properties of the questionnaires (content, convergent and criterion validity, reliability, measurement error, and responsiveness), as well as the risk of bias of each measurement property.
This review included 29 studies, describing 37 questionnaires. Sixty-eight percent showed "adequate" content validity. None of the questionnaires showed overall "adequate" criterion validity, and the risk of bias was "very low" for 92%. One questionnaire showed "adequate" convergent validity, and 73% of the studies were classified with a "high risk of bias." Seven questionnaires showed "adequate" reliability, and 27.3% of the studies were rated with a "very low risk of bias." None of the questionnaires showed "adequate" criterion validity and reliability, simultaneously.
Existing questionnaires have insufficient measurement properties, and none considered the 24-hour movement behavior paradigm. These results highlight the need for better questionnaires of movement behavior combinations, to improve the monitoring and surveillance systems of 24-hour movement behaviors in this population.
我们旨在系统回顾关于测量儿童和青少年24小时运动行为的自评和代理报告问卷测量属性的文献。
检索了截至2021年6月的PubMed、PsycINFO、SPORTDiscus和EMBASE数据库。纳入的研究要求有效性研究的样本量至少有50名参与者,并且至少包括问卷的有效性和重测信度结果。该综述遵循了基于共识的健康测量工具选择标准指南的改编版,以评估问卷测量属性的质量(内容、收敛效度和标准效度、信度、测量误差和反应度),以及每个测量属性的偏倚风险。
本综述纳入了29项研究,描述了37份问卷。68%的问卷显示“充分”的内容效度。没有一份问卷显示总体“充分”的标准效度,92%的偏倚风险为“非常低”。一份问卷显示“充分”的收敛效度,73%的研究被归类为“高偏倚风险”。七份问卷显示“充分”的信度,27.3%的研究被评为“非常低偏倚风险”。没有一份问卷同时显示“充分”的标准效度和信度。
现有的问卷测量属性不足,且没有一份考虑到24小时运动行为范式。这些结果凸显了需要更好的运动行为组合问卷,以改善该人群24小时运动行为的监测和监督系统。