From the Departments of Urology (J.H., A.K., K.K., J.S., R.A.G.), Radiology (J.W., K.G., A.S., M.H.), and Pathology (C.-G.P.), Sahlgrenska University Hospital-Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, and the Department of Urology, Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University (J.H., M.M., S.V.C.), Gothenburg, and the Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm (L.E.) - all in Sweden; the Departments of Pathology and Molecular Oncology, Oslo University Hospital-Radiumhospitalet, Oslo (U.A.); and the Departments of Surgery (Urology Service) and Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York (S.V.C.).
N Engl J Med. 2022 Dec 8;387(23):2126-2137. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2209454.
Screening for prostate cancer is burdened by a high rate of overdiagnosis. The most appropriate algorithm for population-based screening is unknown.
We invited 37,887 men who were 50 to 60 years of age to undergo regular prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening. Participants with a PSA level of 3 ng per milliliter or higher underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the prostate; one third of the participants were randomly assigned to a reference group that underwent systematic biopsy as well as targeted biopsy of suspicious lesions shown on MRI. The remaining participants were assigned to the experimental group and underwent MRI-targeted biopsy only. The primary outcome was clinically insignificant prostate cancer, defined as a Gleason score of 3+3. The secondary outcome was clinically significant prostate cancer, defined as a Gleason score of at least 3+4. Safety was also assessed.
Of the men who were invited to undergo screening, 17,980 (47%) participated in the trial. A total of 66 of the 11,986 participants in the experimental group (0.6%) received a diagnosis of clinically insignificant prostate cancer, as compared with 72 of 5994 participants (1.2%) in the reference group, a difference of -0.7 percentage points (95% confidence interval [CI], -1.0 to -0.4; relative risk, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.33 to 0.64; P<0.001). The relative risk of clinically significant prostate cancer in the experimental group as compared with the reference group was 0.81 (95% CI, 0.60 to 1.1). Clinically significant cancer that was detected only by systematic biopsy was diagnosed in 10 participants in the reference group; all cases were of intermediate risk and involved mainly low-volume disease that was managed with active surveillance. Serious adverse events were rare (<0.1%) in the two groups.
The avoidance of systematic biopsy in favor of MRI-directed targeted biopsy for screening and early detection in persons with elevated PSA levels reduced the risk of overdiagnosis by half at the cost of delaying detection of intermediate-risk tumors in a small proportion of patients. (Funded by Karin and Christer Johansson's Foundation and others; GÖTEBORG-2 ISRCTN Registry number, ISRCTN94604465.).
前列腺癌筛查存在较高的过度诊断率。目前尚不清楚最适合人群的筛查算法。
我们邀请了 37887 名 50 至 60 岁的男性进行常规前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)筛查。PSA 水平达到 3ng/ml 或更高的患者进行前列腺磁共振成像(MRI)检查;其中三分之一的患者被随机分配至对照组,接受系统活检和 MRI 显示可疑病变的靶向活检。其余患者被分配至实验组,仅接受 MRI 靶向活检。主要结局为临床意义不显著的前列腺癌,定义为 Gleason 评分 3+3。次要结局为临床意义显著的前列腺癌,定义为 Gleason 评分至少 3+4。还评估了安全性。
在被邀请进行筛查的男性中,有 17980 人(47%)参加了试验。实验组的 11986 名患者中有 66 名(0.6%)诊断为临床意义不显著的前列腺癌,而对照组的 5994 名患者中有 72 名(1.2%),差异为-0.7 个百分点(95%置信区间 [CI],-1.0 至-0.4;相对风险,0.46;95% CI,0.33 至 0.64;P<0.001)。实验组与对照组相比,临床意义显著的前列腺癌的相对风险为 0.81(95% CI,0.60 至 1.1)。对照组中仅通过系统活检检测到的临床意义显著的癌症有 10 例;所有病例均为中危,主要涉及低容量疾病,采用主动监测进行管理。两组的严重不良事件均很少见(<0.1%)。
在 PSA 水平升高的人群中,通过 MRI 引导的靶向活检代替系统活检进行筛查和早期检测,将过度诊断的风险降低了一半,但代价是一小部分患者的中危肿瘤检测延迟。(由 Karin 和 Christer Johansson 基金会等资助;GÖTEBORG-2 ISRCTN 注册号,ISRCTN94604465。)