• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用机器学习模型预测急性冠状动脉综合征患者的院内死亡率。

Use of machine learning models to predict in-hospital mortality in patients with acute coronary syndrome.

机构信息

Clinical Research Center, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.

Yidu Cloud Technology Inc., Beijing, China.

出版信息

Clin Cardiol. 2023 Feb;46(2):184-194. doi: 10.1002/clc.23957. Epub 2022 Dec 7.

DOI:10.1002/clc.23957
PMID:36479714
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9933107/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cardiovascular diseases are a significant health burden with the prevalence increasing worldwide. Thus, a highly accurate assessment and prediction of death risk are crucial to meet the clinical demand. This study sought to develop and validate a model to predict in-hospital mortality among patients with the acute coronary syndrome (ACS) using nonlinear algorithms.

METHODS

A total of 2414 ACS patients were enrolled in this study. All samples were divided into five groups for cross-validation. The logistic regression (LR) model and XGboost model were applied to predict in-hospital mortality. The results of two models were compared between the variable set by the global registry of acute coronary events (GRACE) score and the selected variable set.

RESULTS

The in-hospital mortality rate was 3.5% in the dataset. Model performance on the selected variable set was better than that on GRACE variables: a 3% increase in area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) for LR and 1.3% for XGBoost. The AUC of XGBoost is 0.913 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.910-0.916), demonstrating a better discrimination ability than LR (AUC = 0.904, 95% CI: 0.902-0.905) on the selected variable set. Almost perfect calibration was found in XGBoost (slope of predicted to observed events, 1.08; intercept, -0.103; p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

XGboost modeling, an advanced machine learning algorithm, identifies new variables and provides high accuracy for the prediction of in-hospital mortality in ACS patients.

摘要

背景

心血管疾病是全球范围内一个重大的健康负担,其患病率正在不断增加。因此,对死亡风险进行高度准确的评估和预测对于满足临床需求至关重要。本研究旨在使用非线性算法开发和验证一种预测急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者住院期间死亡率的模型。

方法

本研究共纳入 2414 例 ACS 患者。所有样本被分为五组进行交叉验证。应用逻辑回归(LR)模型和 XGBoost 模型预测住院期间死亡率。比较了基于全球急性冠状动脉事件注册(GRACE)评分的变量集和选择变量集的两种模型的结果。

结果

数据集的住院死亡率为 3.5%。在选择变量集上,模型性能优于 GRACE 变量:LR 的受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线下面积(AUC)增加 3%,XGBoost 增加 1.3%。XGBoost 的 AUC 为 0.913(95%置信区间[CI]:0.910-0.916),在选择变量集上,其鉴别能力优于 LR(AUC=0.904,95%CI:0.902-0.905)。XGBoost 发现几乎完美的校准(预测与观察事件的斜率,1.08;截距,-0.103;p<0.001)。

结论

XGBoost 建模是一种先进的机器学习算法,可识别新变量,并为 ACS 患者住院期间死亡率的预测提供高度准确性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f71/9933107/6638f4cf1566/CLC-46-184-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f71/9933107/ad325521055d/CLC-46-184-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f71/9933107/4c735e3f342b/CLC-46-184-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f71/9933107/6638f4cf1566/CLC-46-184-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f71/9933107/ad325521055d/CLC-46-184-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f71/9933107/4c735e3f342b/CLC-46-184-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f71/9933107/6638f4cf1566/CLC-46-184-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Use of machine learning models to predict in-hospital mortality in patients with acute coronary syndrome.使用机器学习模型预测急性冠状动脉综合征患者的院内死亡率。
Clin Cardiol. 2023 Feb;46(2):184-194. doi: 10.1002/clc.23957. Epub 2022 Dec 7.
2
Extensive phenotype data and machine learning in prediction of mortality in acute coronary syndrome - the MADDEC study.急性冠状动脉综合征患者死亡率预测中的广泛表型数据和机器学习 - MADDEC 研究。
Ann Med. 2019 Mar;51(2):156-163. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2019.1596302. Epub 2019 Apr 27.
3
Development of interpretable machine learning models to predict in-hospital prognosis of acute heart failure patients.开发可解释的机器学习模型以预测急性心力衰竭患者的院内预后。
ESC Heart Fail. 2024 Oct;11(5):2798-2812. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14834. Epub 2024 May 15.
4
Machine learning for early prediction of in-hospital cardiac arrest in patients with acute coronary syndromes.机器学习在急性冠脉综合征患者中心脏骤停的早期预测中的应用。
Clin Cardiol. 2021 Mar;44(3):349-356. doi: 10.1002/clc.23541. Epub 2021 Feb 14.
5
A new approach for interpretability and reliability in clinical risk prediction: Acute coronary syndrome scenario.一种用于临床风险预测中的可解释性和可靠性的新方法:急性冠状动脉综合征场景。
Artif Intell Med. 2021 Jul;117:102113. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2021.102113. Epub 2021 May 13.
6
Machine learning-based in-hospital mortality prediction models for patients with acute coronary syndrome.基于机器学习的急性冠状动脉综合征患者院内死亡率预测模型。
Am J Emerg Med. 2022 Mar;53:127-134. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.12.070. Epub 2022 Jan 5.
7
Mortality Prediction in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Using Traditional and Machine Learning Algorithms.使用传统和机器学习算法预测严重创伤性脑损伤的死亡率。
J Neurotrauma. 2023 Jul;40(13-14):1366-1375. doi: 10.1089/neu.2022.0221. Epub 2023 Apr 12.
8
Sex-specific evaluation and redevelopment of the GRACE score in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes in populations from the UK and Switzerland: a multinational analysis with external cohort validation.在英国和瑞士人群中的非 ST 段抬高急性冠脉综合征中对 GRACE 评分进行性别特异性评估和重新开发:一项具有外部队列验证的多国分析。
Lancet. 2022 Sep 3;400(10354):744-756. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01483-0. Epub 2022 Aug 29.
9
A LASSO-derived risk model for long-term mortality in Chinese patients with acute coronary syndrome.一种用于中国急性冠状动脉综合征患者长期死亡率的基于套索算法的风险模型。
J Transl Med. 2020 Apr 6;18(1):157. doi: 10.1186/s12967-020-02319-7.
10
Machine learning for prediction of 30-day mortality after ST elevation myocardial infraction: An Acute Coronary Syndrome Israeli Survey data mining study.机器学习预测 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死 30 天后的死亡率:一项急性冠状动脉综合征以色列调查数据挖掘研究。
Int J Cardiol. 2017 Nov 1;246:7-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.05.067.

引用本文的文献

1
The efficacy of artificial intelligence in predicting mortality rate and cardiogenic shock in acute coronary syndrome patients.人工智能在预测急性冠状动脉综合征患者死亡率和心源性休克方面的疗效。
Int J Cardiol Cardiovasc Risk Prev. 2025 Apr 30;26:200407. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcrp.2025.200407. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
Predicting In-Hospital Mortality in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Comparison of Machine Learning Approaches.预测急性心肌梗死患者的院内死亡率:机器学习方法的比较
Clin Cardiol. 2025 Apr;48(4):e70124. doi: 10.1002/clc.70124.
3
Prediction of Hospital Mortality in Patients with ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Evolution of Risk Measurement Techniques and Assessment of Their Effectiveness (Review).

本文引用的文献

1
Machine Learning-Driven Models to Predict Prognostic Outcomes in Patients Hospitalized With Heart Failure Using Electronic Health Records: Retrospective Study.利用电子健康记录通过机器学习驱动模型预测心力衰竭住院患者的预后结果:一项回顾性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Apr 19;23(4):e24996. doi: 10.2196/24996.
2
A risk score to predict in-hospital mortality in patients with acute coronary syndrome at early medical contact: results from the Improving Care for Cardiovascular Disease in China-Acute Coronary Syndrome (CCC-ACS) Project.一种预测急性冠状动脉综合征患者早期就医时院内死亡率的风险评分:中国改善心血管疾病护理-急性冠状动脉综合征(CCC-ACS)项目的结果
Ann Transl Med. 2021 Jan;9(2):167. doi: 10.21037/atm-21-31.
3
ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者医院死亡率的预测:风险测量技术的演变及其有效性评估(综述)
Sovrem Tekhnologii Med. 2024;16(4):61-72. doi: 10.17691/stm2024.16.4.07. Epub 2024 Aug 30.
4
Machine Learning Applications in Acute Coronary Syndrome: Diagnosis, Outcomes and Management.机器学习在急性冠状动脉综合征中的应用:诊断、预后与管理
Adv Ther. 2025 Feb;42(2):636-665. doi: 10.1007/s12325-024-03060-z. Epub 2024 Dec 6.
5
Performance of the Models Predicting In-Hospital Mortality in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction with Predictors in Categorical and Continuous Forms.基于分类和连续形式的预测因子预测 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者住院死亡率的模型性能。
Sovrem Tekhnologii Med. 2024;16(1):15-25. doi: 10.17691/stm2024.16.1.02. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
6
Artificial intelligence based prediction model of in-hospital mortality among females with acute coronary syndrome: for the Jerusalem Platelets Thrombosis and Intervention in Cardiology (JUPITER-12) Study Group.基于人工智能的急性冠状动脉综合征女性患者院内死亡率预测模型:针对耶路撒冷血小板血栓形成与心脏病干预研究组(JUPITER - 12)
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Mar 4;11:1333252. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1333252. eCollection 2024.
Acute coronary syndromes: summary of updated NICE guidance.
急性冠状动脉综合征:英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)最新指南总结
BMJ. 2021 Jan 15;372:m4760. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m4760.
4
Risk Assessment Using Risk Scores in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome.急性冠状动脉综合征患者中使用风险评分进行风险评估
J Clin Med. 2020 Sep 21;9(9):3039. doi: 10.3390/jcm9093039.
5
Value of a Machine Learning Approach for Predicting Clinical Outcomes in Young Patients With Hypertension.机器学习方法预测年轻高血压患者临床结局的价值。
Hypertension. 2020 May;75(5):1271-1278. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.119.13404. Epub 2020 Mar 16.
6
Hospital mortality in acute coronary syndrome: adjustment of GRACE score by D-dimer enables a more accurate prediction in a prospective cohort study.急性冠状动脉综合征患者的住院死亡率:前瞻性队列研究中,通过 D-二聚体调整 GRACE 评分可更准确地预测。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2019 Nov 10;19(1):252. doi: 10.1186/s12872-019-1239-4.
7
Prognostic impact of alkaline phosphatase for in-hospital mortality in patients with acute coronary syndrome: a prospective cohort study in China.碱性磷酸酶对中国急性冠状动脉综合征患者住院死亡率的预后影响:一项前瞻性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 8;9(8):e025648. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025648.
8
Machine learning for the prediction of volume responsiveness in patients with oliguric acute kidney injury in critical care.机器学习在危重症少尿型急性肾损伤患者容量反应性预测中的应用。
Crit Care. 2019 Apr 8;23(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2411-z.
9
Determinants of In-Hospital Mortality After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Machine Learning Approach.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后住院死亡率的决定因素:一种机器学习方法。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Mar 5;8(5):e011160. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.011160.
10
Derivation and validation of a simple inflammation-based risk score system for predicting in-hospital mortality in acute coronary syndrome patients.基于炎症的急性冠状动脉综合征患者住院死亡率预测简易评分系统的建立与验证。
J Cardiol. 2019 May;73(5):416-424. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2018.11.010. Epub 2018 Dec 29.