Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital Yunlin Branch, Douliu, Taiwan; Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
National Taiwan University Cancer Centre, Taipei, Taiwan.
ESMO Open. 2022 Dec;7(6):100742. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100742. Epub 2022 Dec 6.
Anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive (ALK+) and ROS proto-oncogene 1 (ROS1)-positive (ROS1+) lung cancers have been reported to be associated with an elevated risk of thromboembolic events. This study aimed to assess the long-term risk of developing thromboembolism (TE) in ROS1+ lung cancer and to compare it with other oncogenic drivers in the Asian population.
We retrospectively enrolled a cohort of ROS1+ lung adenocarcinoma in a medical center in Taiwan and a comparison cohort of ALK+ and epidermal growth factor receptor-positive (EGFR+) lung cancers. Venous and arterial TEs were identified throughout the cancer course, and the incidence rate was calculated.
We enrolled 44 ROS1+, 98 ALK+, and 168 EGFR+ non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. A total of 11 (25%), 36 (36.7%), and 38 (22.6%) patients in the ROS1, ALK, and EGFR cohorts, respectively, were diagnosed with thromboembolic events throughout the follow-up course of the disease (P = 0.042). The incidence rates were 99.0, 91.9, and 82.5 events per 1000 person-years for the ROS1, ALK, and EGFR cohorts, respectively. The majority of thrombosis events in the ROS1 (91.6%) and ALK (85.4%) cohorts were venous. On the contrary, 43.2% of thromboembolic events were arterial in the EGFR cohort. A higher proportion of thromboembolic events were noted during cancer diagnosis in the ROS1 cohort (36.3%) than in the ALK (16.7%) and EGFR (10.5%) cohorts. The stage was the only clinical variable associated with thromboembolic risk. There was a significant difference in survival between patients with and without TE in the EGFR cohort, but not in the ALK and ROS1 cohorts.
Although ROS1+ and ALK+ NSCLCs had a higher cumulative incidence of TE than EGFR+ NSCLC, the person-year incidence rates were similar among the three groups. EGFR-mutated NSCLC had more arterial events. Nevertheless, ALK+ lung cancer had higher venous events than EGFR-mutated lung cancer.
已报道间变性淋巴瘤激酶阳性(ALK+)和 ROS1 原癌基因 1 阳性(ROS1+)肺癌与血栓栓塞事件风险升高相关。本研究旨在评估 ROS1+肺癌发生血栓栓塞(TE)的长期风险,并与亚洲人群中的其他致癌驱动因素进行比较。
我们回顾性地纳入了台湾一家医学中心的 ROS1+肺腺癌队列和ALK+和表皮生长因子受体阳性(EGFR+)肺癌的对照队列。在整个癌症过程中确定静脉和动脉 TE,并计算发病率。
我们纳入了 44 例 ROS1+、98 例 ALK+和 168 例 EGFR+非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者。ROS1、ALK 和 EGFR 队列中分别有 11(25%)、36(36.7%)和 38(22.6%)例患者在疾病随访过程中被诊断为血栓栓塞事件(P=0.042)。ROS1、ALK 和 EGFR 队列的发病率分别为 99.0、91.9 和 82.5 例/1000 人年。ROS1(91.6%)和 ALK(85.4%)队列中的大多数血栓事件为静脉血栓。相反,EGFR 队列中 43.2%的血栓栓塞事件为动脉血栓。ROS1 队列中,在诊断癌症时,血栓栓塞事件的比例较高(36.3%),而 ALK(16.7%)和 EGFR(10.5%)队列中则较低。分期是唯一与血栓栓塞风险相关的临床变量。EGFR 队列中,有和无 TE 的患者之间的生存存在显著差异,但在 ALK 和 ROS1 队列中则没有。
尽管 ROS1+和 ALK+NSCLC 的 TE 累积发生率高于 EGFR+NSCLC,但三组的人年发病率相似。EGFR 突变型 NSCLC 发生更多的动脉事件。然而,ALK+肺癌的静脉事件发生率高于 EGFR 突变型肺癌。