Silva Sabrina de Oliveira, Barbosa Jessica Bandeira, Lemos Thiago, Oliveira Laura Alice Santos, Ferreira Arthur de Sá
Postgraduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, Augusto Motta University Center, Brazil.
School of Physiotherapy, Augusto Motta University Center, Brazil.
Geriatr Nurs. 2023 Jan-Feb;49:109-114. doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2022.11.016. Epub 2022 Dec 7.
Falls in hospitalized older adults are of concern and, despite the availability of fall risk assessment methods and knowledge about factors associated with falls, their validity and agreement remain poorly investigated. In a prospective study, we enrolled 102 hospitalized older adults (median [P25-P75]) 67 (64-73) years, 52 [51%] men, length of stay 20 [8-41] days). Fall risk was assessed at hospital admission using the Functional Independence Measure; Morse Fall Scale; St. Thomas's Risk Assessment Tool in Falling Elderly Inpatients; Johns Hopkins Fall Risk Assessment Tool; and polypharmacy. The St. Thomas's Risk Assessment Tool in Falling Elderly Inpatients method showed the highest predictive performance (accuracy 92%) for the identification of fallers during hospitalization. A slightly better-then-chance agreement was estimated between all methods (Light's κ = 0.120). Fall risk assessment methods and factors associated with falls should not be used interchangeably as their overall and pairwise agreement are fair at best.
住院老年人跌倒问题备受关注,尽管有跌倒风险评估方法且了解与跌倒相关的因素,但对其有效性和一致性的研究仍很不足。在一项前瞻性研究中,我们纳入了102名住院老年人(中位数[第25百分位数-第75百分位数]),年龄67(64-73)岁,男性52名[51%],住院时间20[8-41]天。入院时使用功能独立性测量、莫尔斯跌倒量表、圣托马斯老年住院患者跌倒风险评估工具、约翰霍普金斯跌倒风险评估工具以及多重用药情况来评估跌倒风险。圣托马斯老年住院患者跌倒风险评估工具方法在识别住院期间跌倒者方面显示出最高的预测性能(准确率92%)。所有方法之间的一致性略高于随机水平(莱特κ系数=0.120)。跌倒风险评估方法和与跌倒相关的因素不应相互替代使用,因为它们的总体一致性和两两一致性充其量只是一般。