Children's Research Center, Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St SW, MN, 55905, Rochester, USA.
Charles Widger School of Law, Villanova University, Villanova, PA, USA.
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2023 Mar;40(3):455-464. doi: 10.1007/s10815-022-02692-w. Epub 2022 Dec 21.
A systematic review and meta-analysis of pertinent literature published from 2006 to January 2022 were conducted to study and compare vitrification and slow freezing, the two prominent methods of ovarian tissue cryopreservation. The primary outcome measures for this study were (1) proportion of intact primordial follicles, (2) proportion of intact stromal cells, (3) proportion of DNA fragmentation in primordial follicles, and (4) mean primordial follicle density. This meta-analysis of 19 studies revealed a significantly greater proportion of intact stromal cells in vitrified tissue versus slow-frozen tissue. No significant differences upon pooled analyses were observed between the two cryopreservation methods with respect to the proportion of intact primordial follicles, proportion of DNA fragmentation, or mean primordial follicle density. Due to differences seen in stromal cell viability, vitrification may be a preferred option to preserve histology of tissue. However, more work should be done to compare the two freezing techniques with less heterogeneity caused by patients, samples, and protocols.
对 2006 年至 2022 年 1 月发表的相关文献进行了系统评价和荟萃分析,以研究和比较玻璃化和慢速冷冻这两种突出的卵巢组织冷冻保存方法。本研究的主要观察指标为:(1)原始卵泡完整率;(2)基质细胞完整率;(3)原始卵泡 DNA 碎片化率;(4)原始卵泡密度平均值。对 19 项研究的荟萃分析显示,玻璃化组织中基质细胞完整率明显高于慢速冷冻组织。两种冷冻保存方法在原始卵泡完整率、DNA 碎片化率或原始卵泡密度平均值方面,经汇总分析后无显著差异。由于基质细胞活力存在差异,玻璃化可能是保存组织学的首选方法。然而,为了比较两种冷冻技术,还需要做更多的工作,减少因患者、样本和方案不同而导致的异质性。