Lima Jales Henrique Pereira de, Jorge Patrícia Polles de Oliveira, Solé Dirceu, Wandalsen Gustavo Falbo
Discipline of Allergy, Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Federal University of São Paulo - EPM - UNIFESP, São Paulo - SP, Brazil;
Department of Medicine, Federal University of São Carlos - UFSCar, São Carlos - SP, Brazil.
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr). 2022 Dec 19;50(S Pt 3):10-16. doi: 10.15586/aei.v50iSP3.751. eCollection 2022.
Asthma is one of the most common chronic diseases of childhood. Spirometry is the traditional test for assessing lung function, while impulse oscillometrics is an alternative resource that measures the impedance of the respiratory system.
To evaluate the pulmonary function of children and adolescents with asthma by impulse oscillometry and correlate the findings with those obtained by spirometry.
A cross-sectional study in which the pulmonary function of asthmatic children and adolescents aged between 6 and 18 years was evaluated, categorized by the level of disease control according to the Asthma Control Test (ACT) or Children Asthma Control Test (C-ACT) into controlled (ACT/C-ACT>19; n = 70) and uncontrolled (ACT/C-ACT ≤ 19; n = 60).
A total of 130 asthmatic children and adolescents were evaluated (51% were males). There were no significant differences in the parameter values of both tests when patients were divided by the level of asthma control. Altered impulse oscillometry and spirometry were performed in 20 and 25% of the cases, respectively. Changes in impulse oscillometry were more frequent in patients with controlled asthma. R5 (%), X5 (%), and Fres showed moderate correlation with the main spirometric parameters, being stronger between X5 (%) and FEV/FVC (%) (r: -0,58; P < 0,05) in patients with controlled asthma. Bronchodilator response was observed in a similar number of patients in both exams, but with reasonable agreement.
Impulse oscillometry values showed a weak or moderate correlation with spirometry values.
哮喘是儿童最常见的慢性疾病之一。肺量计检查是评估肺功能的传统测试,而脉冲振荡法是一种测量呼吸系统阻抗的替代方法。
通过脉冲振荡法评估哮喘儿童和青少年的肺功能,并将结果与肺量计检查结果进行关联。
一项横断面研究,评估了6至18岁哮喘儿童和青少年的肺功能,根据哮喘控制测试(ACT)或儿童哮喘控制测试(C-ACT)将疾病控制水平分类为控制良好(ACT/C-ACT>19;n = 70)和控制不佳(ACT/C-ACT≤19;n = 60)。
共评估了130名哮喘儿童和青少年(51%为男性)。当按哮喘控制水平对患者进行分组时,两种测试的参数值没有显著差异。分别有20%和25%的病例出现脉冲振荡法和肺量计检查结果异常。在哮喘控制良好的患者中,脉冲振荡法的变化更为频繁。R5(%)、X5(%)和Fres与主要肺量计参数呈中度相关,在哮喘控制良好的患者中,X5(%)与FEV/FVC(%)之间的相关性更强(r:-0.58;P<0.05)。两种检查中观察到支气管扩张剂反应的患者数量相似,但一致性尚可。
脉冲振荡法值与肺量计检查值呈弱或中度相关。