Fang Shuanghu, Ding Dongyan
School of Educational Science, Anhui Normal University, Wuhu, China.
Front Psychol. 2022 Dec 6;13:1069748. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1069748. eCollection 2022.
The psychological flexibility model can be seen as a basis for an integrated and progressive psychological approach to chronic pain management. Some researchers suggest that psychological flexibility and inflexibility represent distinct processes and constructs. This meta-analysis is the first to provide a summary estimate of the overall effect size for the relationship between psychological (in)flexibility and common outcomes among chronic pain patients. The research protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO, https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/), registration number CRD42021285705. Four databases were searched (PsycINFO; PubMed; Web of Science, CINAHL) along with reference lists. Thirty-six cross-sectional studies were included (7,779 participants). Meta-analyses (random effects model) indicated a significant medium negative association between psychological flexibility and pain intensity or functional impairment. The present study also indicated a significant small to medium association between psychological inflexibility and pain intensity, a nearly large association between psychological inflexibility and functional impairment as well as the quality of life, and a large association between psychological inflexibility and anxiety/depression. Due to the limited number of included studies, the relationship between risk behavior and psychological inflexibility may not be significant. Types of countries and instruments measuring psychological inflexibility may explain part of the heterogeneity. These findings may carry significant implications for chronic pain patients regarding the potential relationship between psychological inflexibility or flexibility and these outcomes. It may consequently form the basis for more robust testing of causal and manipulable relationships.
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier: CRD42021285705.
心理灵活性模型可被视为慢性疼痛管理综合渐进心理方法的基础。一些研究人员认为,心理灵活性和不灵活性代表不同的过程和结构。这项荟萃分析首次对慢性疼痛患者心理(不)灵活性与常见结果之间关系的总体效应大小进行了汇总估计。研究方案已在国际系统评价前瞻性注册库(PROSPERO,https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/)注册,注册号为CRD42021285705。检索了四个数据库(PsycINFO;PubMed;科学网,CINAHL)以及参考文献列表。纳入了36项横断面研究(7779名参与者)。荟萃分析(随机效应模型)表明,心理灵活性与疼痛强度或功能损害之间存在显著的中等负相关。本研究还表明,心理不灵活性与疼痛强度之间存在显著的小到中等程度的关联,心理不灵活性与功能损害以及生活质量之间存在近乎较大的关联,心理不灵活性与焦虑/抑郁之间存在较大的关联。由于纳入研究数量有限,风险行为与心理不灵活性之间的关系可能不显著。国家类型和测量心理不灵活性的工具可能解释了部分异质性。这些发现可能对慢性疼痛患者在心理不灵活性或灵活性与这些结果之间的潜在关系方面具有重要意义。因此,它可能为更有力地检验因果关系和可操纵关系奠定基础。