Suppr超能文献

社区药房与全科医疗协作与整合工作:一个实际主义综述研究方案。

Community pharmacy and general practice collaborative and integrated working: a realist review protocol.

机构信息

Department of Primary Care & Population Health, University College London, London, UK

School of Health Sciences, University of Surrey, Surrey, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2022 Dec 29;12(12):e067034. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067034.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Increasing collaborative and integrated working between General practice (GP) and Community pharmacy (CP) is a key priority of the UK National Health Service and has been proposed as a solution to reducing health system fragmentation, improving synergies and coordination of care. However, there is limited understanding regarding how and under which circumstances collaborative and integrated working between GP and CP can be achieved in practice and how regulatory, organisational and systemic barriers can be overcome.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The aim of our review is to understand how, when and why working arrangements between GP and CP can provide the conditions necessary for optimal communication, decision-making, and collaborative and integrated working. A realist review approach will be used to synthesise the evidence to make sense of the complexities inherent in the working relationships between GP and CP. Our review will follow Pawson's five iterative stages: (1) finding existing theories; (2) searching for evidence (our main searches were conducted in April 2022); (3) article selection; (4) data extraction and (5) synthesising evidence and drawing conclusions. We will synthesise evidence from grey literature, qualitative, quantitative and mixed-methods research. The research team will work closely with key stakeholders and include patient and public involvement and engagement throughout the review process to refine the focus of the review and the programme theory. Collectively, our refined programme theory will explain how collaborative and integrated working between GP and CP works (or not), for whom, how and under which circumstances.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Formal ethical approval is not required for this review as it draws on secondary data from published articles and grey literature. Findings will be widely disseminated through: publication in peer-reviewed journals, seminars, international conference presentations, patients' association channels, social media, symposia and user-friendly summaries.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42022314280.

摘要

简介

加强全科医生(GP)和社区药房(CP)之间的协作和整合工作是英国国民保健制度的一个关键优先事项,并被提议作为减少卫生系统碎片化、提高协同效应和协调护理的一种解决方案。然而,对于如何以及在何种情况下可以在实践中实现 GP 和 CP 之间的协作和整合工作,以及如何克服监管、组织和系统障碍,人们的理解有限。

方法和分析

我们的综述旨在了解 GP 和 CP 之间的工作安排如何、何时以及为何能够为最佳沟通、决策以及协作和整合工作提供必要的条件。将采用现实主义综述方法来综合证据,以理解 GP 和 CP 之间工作关系中固有的复杂性。我们的综述将遵循 Pawson 的五个迭代阶段:(1)寻找现有理论;(2)搜索证据(我们的主要搜索于 2022 年 4 月进行);(3)文章选择;(4)数据提取;(5)综合证据并得出结论。我们将综合来自灰色文献、定性、定量和混合方法研究的证据。研究团队将与主要利益相关者密切合作,并在整个综述过程中包括患者和公众的参与,以完善综述的重点和计划理论。我们经过改进的计划理论将共同解释 GP 和 CP 之间的协作和整合工作如何(或不如何)、为谁、如何以及在何种情况下进行。

伦理和传播

由于本综述仅利用已发表文章和灰色文献中的二手数据,因此不需要正式的伦理批准。研究结果将通过以下方式广泛传播:发表在同行评议期刊上、研讨会、国际会议演讲、患者协会渠道、社交媒体、座谈会和用户友好的摘要。

PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42022314280。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/601e/9806063/183b5aff0e7b/bmjopen-2022-067034f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验