Kraeutler Matthew J, Fasulo Sydney M, Harris Joshua D, Mei-Dan Omer, Scillia Anthony J
Department of Orthopedics & Sports Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, St. Joseph's University Medical Center, Paterson, New Jersey, USA.
Orthop J Sports Med. 2022 Dec 23;10(12):23259671221143353. doi: 10.1177/23259671221143353. eCollection 2022 Dec.
Previous studies have demonstrated the risks of pudendal nerve and/or soft tissue complications due to the use of a perineal post during hip arthroscopy. Recently, various postless hip arthroscopy techniques have been described in the literature.
To assess the current international trends in the use of postless hip arthroscopy among hip preservation specialists.
Cross-sectional study.
An anonymous 11-item survey was sent by email to all members of the International Society for Hip Arthroscopy (ISHA) in January 2022. Surgeons were asked various questions regarding their current use of post-assisted or postless hip arthroscopy, if they had changed their setup technique during their career and the reason for that change, and their perceived rate of pudendal nerve and/or perineal soft tissue injuries using their current technique. Descriptive statistics were used to report the results of each question. The Student test was used to compare the number of years in practice between post-assisted and postless users. Fisher exact tests were performed to compare categorical rates of pudendal nerve and soft tissue complications between post-assisted and postless users.
A total of 126 surveys were completed from 431 ISHA members (29.2%). Sixty-one percent of the surgeons currently use a perineal post, while 33% use a postless technique. Seventy-five percent of the perineal post users and 98% of the postless users self-reported a rate of pudendal nerve and/or soft tissue injury of <1% ( = .015). Among 41 respondents who indicated changing their technique at some point, 59% reported doing so because of pudendal nerve and/or soft tissue complications. Among surgeons who switched from a perineal post to a postless setup, 71% indicated they have noticed a decrease in the rate of pudendal nerve and/or soft tissue complications.
Although use of a perineal post is still a more common setup technique among hip arthroscopists, approximately one-third of surgeons use a postless technique. Surgeons who have switched to a postless technique often did so because of perineal complications, with the majority noticing a subjective decrease in these complications with the use of postless hip arthroscopy.
先前的研究已证明在髋关节镜检查期间使用会阴柱会导致阴部神经和/或软组织并发症的风险。最近,文献中描述了各种无柱髋关节镜检查技术。
评估髋关节保髋专家使用无柱髋关节镜检查的当前国际趋势。
横断面研究。
2022年1月,通过电子邮件向国际髋关节镜学会(ISHA)的所有成员发送了一份包含11个项目的匿名调查问卷。询问外科医生关于他们当前使用辅助柱或无柱髋关节镜检查的各种问题,他们在职业生涯中是否改变了设置技术以及改变的原因,以及他们使用当前技术时认为的阴部神经和/或会阴软组织损伤发生率。使用描述性统计报告每个问题的结果。使用Student检验比较辅助柱使用者和无柱使用者的执业年限。进行Fisher精确检验以比较辅助柱使用者和无柱使用者之间阴部神经和软组织并发症的分类发生率。
431名ISHA成员中共有126份调查问卷完成(29.2%)。61%的外科医生目前使用会阴柱,而33%使用无柱技术。75%的会阴柱使用者和98%的无柱使用者自我报告阴部神经和/或软组织损伤发生率<1%(P = 0.015)。在41名表示在某个时候改变技术的受访者中,59%报告这样做是因为阴部神经和/或软组织并发症。在从会阴柱设置改为无柱设置的外科医生中,71%表示他们注意到阴部神经和/或软组织并发症的发生率有所下降。
尽管在髋关节镜检查医生中使用会阴柱仍然是一种更常见的设置技术,但约三分之一的外科医生使用无柱技术。转向无柱技术的外科医生通常是因为会阴并发症而这样做,大多数人注意到使用无柱髋关节镜检查时这些并发症在主观上有所减少。