Department of I nternal Medicine, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan.
Department of Anesthesiology, Chi Mei Medical center, Tainan, Taiwan.
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 30;17(12):e0279680. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279680. eCollection 2022.
Beta-blockers has been reported to improve all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality in patients receiving dialysis, but type of beta-blockers (i.e., high vs. low dialyzable) on patient outcomes remains unknown. This study aimed at assessing the outcomes of patients receiving dialyzable beta-blockers (DBBs) compared to those receiving non-dialyzable beta-blockers (NDBBs).
We searched the databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials.gov until 28 February 2022 to identify articles investigating the impact of DBBs/NDBBs among patients with renal failure receiving hemodialysis/peritoneal dialysis (HD/PD). The primary outcome was risks of all-cause mortality, while the secondary outcomes included risk of overall major adverse cardiac event (MACE), acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and heart failure (HF). We rated the certainty of evidence (COE) by Cochrane methods and the GRADE approach.
Analysis of four observational studies including 75,193 individuals undergoing dialysis in hospital and community settings after a follow-up from 180 days to six years showed an overall all-cause mortality rate of 11.56% (DBBs and NDBBs: 12.32% and 10.7%, respectively) without significant differences in risks of mortality between the two groups [random effect, aHR 0.91 (95% CI, 0.81-1.02), p = 0.11], overall MACE [OR 1.03 (95% CI, 0.78-1.38), p = 0.82], and AMI [OR 1.02 (95% CI, 0.94-1.1), p = 0.66]. Nevertheless, the pooled odds ratio of HF among patients receiving DBBs was lower than those receiving NDBB [random effect, OR 0.87 (95% CI, 0.82-0.93), p<0.001]. The COE was considered low for overall MACE, AMI and HF, while it was deemed moderate for all-cause mortality.
The use of dialyzable and non-dialyzable beta-blockers had no impact on the risk of all-cause mortality, overall MACE, and AMI among dialysis patients. However, DBBs were associated with significant reduction in risk of HF compared with NDBBs. The limited number of available studies warranted further large-scale clinical investigations to support our findings.
已有报道称β受体阻滞剂可降低透析患者的全因死亡率和心血管死亡率,但关于患者结局的β受体阻滞剂类型(即高透还是低透)仍不清楚。本研究旨在评估使用可透析β受体阻滞剂(DBB)与使用不可透析β受体阻滞剂(NDBB)的患者结局。
我们检索了包括 PubMed、Embase、Cochrane 和 ClinicalTrials.gov 在内的数据库,检索时间截至 2022 年 2 月 28 日,以确定研究肾衰接受血液透析/腹膜透析(HD/PD)患者中 DBB/NDBB 影响的文章。主要结局为全因死亡率风险,次要结局包括总主要不良心脏事件(MACE)、急性心肌梗死(AMI)和心力衰竭(HF)风险。我们使用 Cochrane 方法和 GRADE 方法评估证据确定性(COE)。
对四项观察性研究的分析纳入了 75193 名在医院和社区环境中接受透析的个体,随访时间为 180 天至 6 年,结果显示全因死亡率总体为 11.56%(DBB 和 NDBB 分别为 12.32%和 10.7%),两组死亡率风险无显著差异[随机效应,aHR 0.91(95%CI,0.81-1.02),p=0.11],总 MACE[OR 1.03(95%CI,0.78-1.38),p=0.82]和 AMI[OR 1.02(95%CI,0.94-1.1),p=0.66]。然而,接受 DBB 的患者 HF 的汇总优势比低于接受 NDBB 的患者[随机效应,OR 0.87(95%CI,0.82-0.93),p<0.001]。总 MACE、AMI 和 HF 的 COE 被认为是低的,而全因死亡率的 COE 被认为是中等的。
在透析患者中,使用可透析和不可透析的β受体阻滞剂与全因死亡率、总 MACE 和 AMI 风险无关。然而,与 NDBB 相比,DBB 与 HF 风险显著降低相关。现有研究数量有限,需要进一步的大规模临床研究来支持我们的发现。