Wen Jiayu, Cao Yu, Chang Surui, Huang Qiaoyi, Zhang Zhen, Wei Wei, Yao Jiuxiu, Pei Hui, Li Hao
Graduate College, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Department of Geriatrics, Xiyuan Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Front Neurosci. 2022 Dec 14;16:1053283. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.1053283. eCollection 2022.
The second most prevalent cause of dementia is vascular dementia (VaD). Furthermore, acupuncture is a relatively safe and effective traditional therapy for individuals with VaD. We performed a network meta-analysis to assess the effectiveness and safety of various acupuncture therapies for VaD based on existing research.
We searched six electronic databases to screen for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing different acupuncture treatments in VaD patients. The Cochrne tool (Review Manager 5.3) was used to evaluate the risk of bias of the included RCTs. Based on the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework, we assessed the confidence in the evidence using the Confidence In the results from Network Meta-Analysis approach. We used the frequency approach to perform the network meta-analysis. Data were analyzed using R 4.1.1.
In total, we included 46 eligible studies. The results of the network analysis showed that the combined interventions of moxibustion (MB) with body acupuncture (BA) (MB + BA) and electroacupuncture (EA) with scalp acupuncture (SA) with BA (EA + SA + BA) were more effective in improving cognitive functions and activities of daily living compared with SA or BA alone. However, in the subgroup analysis, EA + SA + BA showed better efficacy in short- and mid-term acupuncture compared with other acupuncture therapies.
Combined acupuncture therapy may be a safe and effective intervention for individuals with VaD, and MB + BA and EA + SA + BA appear to be the most effective interventions. However, because the analysis of this study was based on low-to-moderate evidence, there remains no strong supporting evidence. Thus, high-quality, large-scale, and long-term studies should be conducted in the future to assess the effectiveness and safety of acupuncture in VaD.
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier: CRD42022354573.
血管性痴呆(VaD)是痴呆的第二大常见病因。此外,针灸对于VaD患者而言是一种相对安全有效的传统疗法。我们基于现有研究进行了一项网状Meta分析,以评估各种针灸疗法对VaD的有效性和安全性。
我们检索了六个电子数据库,以筛选比较不同针灸治疗对VaD患者疗效的随机对照试验(RCT)。使用Cochrane工具(Review Manager 5.3)评估纳入的RCT的偏倚风险。基于推荐分级评估、制定与评价框架,我们采用网状Meta分析结果的置信度方法评估证据的可信度。我们使用频率法进行网状Meta分析。数据采用R 4.1.1进行分析。
我们总共纳入了46项符合条件的研究。网状分析结果显示,与单独使用头皮针(SA)或体针(BA)相比,艾灸(MB)与体针(BA)联合干预(MB + BA)以及电针(EA)与头皮针(SA)和体针(BA)联合干预(EA + SA + BA)在改善认知功能和日常生活活动方面更有效。然而,在亚组分析中,与其他针灸疗法相比,EA + SA + BA在短期和中期针灸治疗中显示出更好的疗效。
联合针灸疗法可能是VaD患者的一种安全有效的干预措施,MB + BA和EA + SA + BA似乎是最有效的干预措施。然而,由于本研究的分析基于低至中等质量的证据,因此仍缺乏有力的支持证据。因此,未来应开展高质量、大规模和长期的研究,以评估针灸对VaD的有效性和安全性。