Zidan Ali, Noureldin Abdelrahman, Kumar Shreya Anil, Elsebaie Abdelrahman, Othman Maha
Department of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences, School of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Clinical Pathology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansura, Egypt.
Semin Thromb Hemost. 2023 Feb;49(1):9-14. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1759684. Epub 2023 Jan 5.
Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) has been reported in association with the coronavirus disease 2019 preventative adenovirus vector-based vaccines ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (Oxford/AstraZeneca) and Ad26.COV2.S (Janssen/Johnson & Johnson) in hundreds of recipients across the globe. VITT is characterized by thrombosis, typically at unusual sites, low fibrinogen, and elevated plasma D-dimer, generally manifesting between 4 and 28 days following vaccination. Detection of anti-platelet factor antibodies using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) is often confirmatory. Although several similar principles subside in most diagnostic criteria for VITT, the presentation of a positive ELISA assay, use of expert hematology and neurology opinion, and exclusion of possible VITT cases outside the "standard" 4 to 28-day timeframe have contributed a lack of global standardization for defining VITT. Accordingly, the global and regional incidence of VITT differs according to the diagnostic pathway and case definition used. This has influenced the public perception of VITT's severity and the decision to use adenovirus vector-based vaccines for limiting severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection. We hereby delineate the recognized pathogenic mechanisms, global incidence, discrepancies in diagnostic criteria, recommended treatments, and global implications to vaccine hesitancy from this coagulopathy.
疫苗诱导的免疫性血栓性血小板减少症(VITT)已被报道与2019冠状病毒病预防性腺病毒载体疫苗ChAdOx1 nCoV-19(牛津/阿斯利康)和Ad26.COV2.S(杨森/强生)有关,全球数百名接种者出现了该病症。VITT的特征为血栓形成,通常发生在不寻常的部位,纤维蛋白原水平低,血浆D-二聚体升高,一般在接种疫苗后4至28天出现症状。使用酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)检测抗血小板因子抗体通常可确诊。尽管VITT的大多数诊断标准中有几个相似的原则,但ELISA检测呈阳性的表现、血液学和神经学专家意见的运用,以及排除“标准”4至28天时间范围之外可能的VITT病例,导致了VITT定义缺乏全球标准化。因此,VITT的全球和区域发病率因所采用的诊断途径和病例定义而异。这影响了公众对VITT严重程度的认知,以及使用腺病毒载体疫苗来限制严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2感染的决策。我们在此阐述这种凝血病公认的致病机制、全球发病率、诊断标准的差异、推荐的治疗方法以及对疫苗犹豫的全球影响。