Machado Mychal A, Lugo Ashley M
Department of Psychology, University of Alaska Anchorage, 3211 Providence Dr, Anchorage, AK 99508 USA.
School of Behavior Analysis, Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne, FL USA.
Behav Anal Pract. 2021 Mar 12;15(4):1221-1231. doi: 10.1007/s40617-021-00551-1. eCollection 2022 Dec.
Structural racism is rooted in American social systems that were supposedly designed to promote citizens' right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Social systems like policing, for example, are built on a foundation of discriminatory practices designed to disenfranchise Black, Indigenous, and people of color (BIPOC). One of the most recent visible examples of racially biased policing is the excessive use of force by officers toward BIPOC. In response, advocates, policy makers, and researchers have sought solutions. Police use-of-force reforms such as body-worn cameras (BWCs) and implicit bias training (IBT) have become popular and are currently being applied in many police departments across the country. However, evidence supporting the effectiveness of these reform strategies to reduce the use of force is mixed, and further evaluations are needed to understand why these strategies are purported to be an effective solution. The purpose of the current review is to ignite future empirical evaluations of use-of-force reform. Following a summary of the research conducted to date on BWCs and IBT, we will conclude with a brief discussion of how behavior analysts might improve and foster strategies that are efficacious. Our ultimate goal is to leave the reader with an understanding of where the data have taken us thus far and how behavior analysts and others can contribute to the reduction and eradication of the discriminatory practices present in policing and other social systems.
结构性种族主义植根于美国社会制度,这些制度本应旨在促进公民的生命权、自由权和追求幸福的权利。例如,像治安管理这样的社会制度是建立在旨在剥夺黑人、原住民和有色人种(BIPOC)选举权的歧视性做法基础之上的。最近最明显的种族偏见治安管理例子之一是警察对BIPOC过度使用武力。对此,倡导者、政策制定者和研究人员纷纷寻求解决方案。诸如佩戴式随身摄像头(BWC)和隐性偏见培训(IBT)等警察使用武力改革措施已广受欢迎,目前正在全国许多警察部门实施。然而,支持这些改革策略有效减少武力使用的证据参差不齐,需要进一步评估以了解为何这些策略被认为是有效的解决方案。本次综述的目的是激发未来对使用武力改革的实证评估。在总结迄今为止对BWC和IBT的研究之后,我们将简要讨论行为分析师如何改进和推动有效的策略。我们的最终目标是让读者了解到目前数据将我们引向何方,以及行为分析师和其他人如何为减少和消除治安管理及其他社会制度中存在的歧视性做法做出贡献。