Xu Haitao, Pan Xiongfeng, Li Jinming, Feng Shenghan, Guo Shucen
School of Economics and Management, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, 116024, China.
School of Economics and Management, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, 116024, China.
J Environ Manage. 2023 Mar 15;330:117156. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.117156. Epub 2023 Jan 6.
While many literatures have examined the influence of environmental regulation policy, which environmental regulation policy is more effective is still controversial. Taking China and two different economic regions as samples, we explore the effect of two popular environmental regulation policies, that is carbon tax and carbon emission trading, by a multi-regional environmental dynamic computable general equilibrium model. The results show that for the economic development, the carbon emission trading outperforms the carbon tax for the carbon emission trading will generate the lower economic cost. But for the emission reductions, the carbon tax outperforms the carbon emission trading for the total emissions from 2020 to 2030 are smallest when introducing carbon tax policy. We further study the effect of environmental regulation on different industries. It is found that the environmental regulation has a more obvious effect on energy industry, heavy industry and transport service industry.
虽然许多文献研究了环境规制政策的影响,但哪种环境规制政策更有效仍存在争议。以中国和两个不同经济区域为样本,我们通过一个多区域环境动态可计算一般均衡模型,探讨了两种流行的环境规制政策,即碳税和碳排放交易的效果。结果表明,对于经济发展而言,碳排放交易优于碳税,因为碳排放交易将产生更低的经济成本。但对于减排而言,碳税优于碳排放交易,因为在引入碳税政策时,2020年至2030年的总排放量最小。我们进一步研究了环境规制对不同行业的影响。结果发现,环境规制对能源行业、重工业和运输服务业的影响更为明显。