Dong Xuejie, Wang Liang, Xu Hanbing, Ye Yingfang, Zhou Zhenxiang, Zhang Lin
School of Public Health, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200025, China.
Department of Global Health, Peking University School of Public Health, Beijing 100191, China.
J Clin Med. 2022 Dec 25;12(1):163. doi: 10.3390/jcm12010163.
The performance of ambulance crew affects the quality of pre-hospital treatment, which is vital to the survival for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients, yet remains suboptimal in China. In this retrospective analysis study, we aimed to examine the effect of a citywide quality improvement programme on provision of prehospital advanced life support (ALS) by emergency medical service (EMS) system. EMS-treated adult OHCA patients after the implementation of the programme (1 January 2021 to 30 June 2022) were compared with historical controls (1 June 2019 to 31 August 2020) in Suzhou. Multivariable logistic regression analysis and propensity score matching procedures were applied to compare the outcomes between two periods for total OHCA cases and subgroup of cases treated by fixed or non-fixed ambulance crews. A total of 1465 patients (pre-period/post-period: 610/855) were included. In the 1:1 matched analysis of 591 cases for each period, significant improvement (p < 0.05) was observed for the proportion of intravenous (IV) access (23.4% vs. 68.2%), advanced airway management (49.2% vs. 57.0%), and return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) at handover (5.4% vs. 9.0%). The fixed ambulance crews performed better than non-fixed group in IV access and advanced airway management for both periods. There were significant increases in IV access (AOR 12.66, 95%CI 9.02−18.10, p < 0.001), advanced airway management (AOR 1.67, 95% CI 1.30−2.16, p < 0.001) and ROSC at handover (AOR 2.37, 95%CI 1.38−4.23, p = 0.002) after intervention in unfixed group, while no significant improvement was observed in fixed group except for IV access (AOR 7.65, 95%CI 9.02−18.10, p < 0.001). In conclusion, the quality improvement program was positively associated with the provision of prehospital ALS interventions and prehospital ROSC following OHCA. The fixed ambulance crews performed better in critical care provision and prehospital outcome, yet increased protocol adherence and targeted training could fill the underperformance of non-fixed crews efficaciously.
急救人员的表现会影响院前治疗的质量,这对于院外心脏骤停(OHCA)患者的生存至关重要,但在中国,其质量仍不尽人意。在这项回顾性分析研究中,我们旨在探讨全市范围的质量改进计划对紧急医疗服务(EMS)系统提供院前高级生命支持(ALS)的影响。将该计划实施后(2021年1月1日至2022年6月30日)接受EMS治疗的成年OHCA患者与苏州的历史对照组(2019年6月1日至2020年8月31日)进行比较。应用多变量逻辑回归分析和倾向得分匹配程序,比较两个时期OHCA总病例以及由固定或非固定急救人员治疗的病例亚组的结局。共纳入1465例患者(前期/后期:610/855)。在每个时期591例病例的1:1匹配分析中,观察到静脉通路建立比例(23.4%对68.2%)、高级气道管理比例(49.2%对57.0%)和交接时自主循环恢复(ROSC)比例(5.4%对9.0%)有显著改善(p<0.05)。在两个时期,固定急救人员在静脉通路建立和高级气道管理方面的表现均优于非固定组。非固定组干预后,静脉通路建立(比值比[AOR]12.6,95%置信区间[CI]9.02−18.10,p<0.001)、高级气道管理(AOR1.67,95%CI1.30−2.16,p<0.001)和交接时ROSC(AOR2.37,95%CI1.38−4.2,p=0.002)有显著增加,而固定组除静脉通路建立外(AOR7.65,95%CI9.02−18.10,p<0.001)未观察到显著改善。总之,质量改进计划与OHCA后院前ALS干预措施的提供以及院前ROSC呈正相关。固定急救人员在重症护理提供和院前结局方面表现更好,但增加方案依从性和针对性培训可以有效弥补非固定急救人员的不足。