Sabal Barbara, Teper Sławomir, Wylęgała Edward
Chair and Clinical Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, Okregowy Szpital Kolejowy, Panewnicka 65, 40-760 Katowice, Poland.
Department of Ophthalmology, John Paul II Municipal Hospital, 35-241 Rzeszow, Poland.
J Clin Med. 2022 Dec 29;12(1):274. doi: 10.3390/jcm12010274.
Diabetic macular edema (DME) is one of the main causes of visual impairment in patients of working age. DME occurs in 4% of patients at all stages of diabetic retinopathy. Using a subthreshold micropulse laser is an alternative or adjuvant treatment of DME. Micropulse technology demonstrates a high safety profile by selectively targeting the retinal pigment epithelium. There are no standardized protocols for micropulse treatment, however, a 577 nm laser application over the entire macula using a 200 μm retinal spot, 200 ms pulse duration, 400 mW power, and 5% duty cycle is a cost-effective, noninvasive, and safe therapy in mild and moderate macular edemas with retinal thickness below 400 μm. Micropulse lasers, as an addition to the current gold-standard treatment for DME, i.e., anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF), stabilize the anatomic and functional retinal parameters 3 months after the procedure and reduce the number of required injections per year. This paper discusses the published literature on the safety and application of subthreshold micropulse lasers in DME and compares them with intravitreal anti-VEGF or steroid therapies and conventional grid laser photocoagulation. Only English peer-reviewed articles reporting research within the years 2010-2022 were included.
糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DME)是工作年龄患者视力损害的主要原因之一。在糖尿病视网膜病变的各个阶段,4%的患者会发生DME。使用阈下微脉冲激光是DME的一种替代或辅助治疗方法。微脉冲技术通过选择性地靶向视网膜色素上皮,显示出较高的安全性。然而,目前尚无微脉冲治疗的标准化方案,对于视网膜厚度低于400μm的轻度和中度黄斑水肿,使用200μm视网膜光斑、200ms脉冲持续时间、400mW功率和5%占空比的577nm激光对整个黄斑进行照射是一种经济有效、无创且安全的治疗方法。微脉冲激光作为目前DME金标准治疗方法(即抗血管内皮生长因子(抗VEGF))的补充,在治疗后3个月可稳定视网膜的解剖和功能参数,并减少每年所需的注射次数。本文讨论了已发表的关于阈下微脉冲激光在DME中的安全性和应用的文献,并将其与玻璃体内抗VEGF或类固醇疗法以及传统的格栅激光光凝术进行了比较。仅纳入了2010年至2022年期间报告相关研究的英文同行评审文章。