• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Responses of African American Individuals Who Use Menthol Cigarettes to Potential Flavored Tobacco Bans.使用薄荷醇卷烟的非裔美国人对潜在调味烟草禁令的反应。
Am J Prev Med. 2023 Jun;64(6):898-901. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2022.12.005. Epub 2023 Jan 7.
2
Impact of Smoking Cessation Motivations and Barriers on Quit Intentions Following a Hypothetical Flavor Ban Among African American/Black Individuals Who Use Menthol Cigarettes: A Mixed-Methods Study.假设薄荷香烟口味禁令后,非裔美国人/黑人使用薄荷香烟者戒烟动机和障碍对戒烟意愿的影响:一项混合方法研究。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2024 May 31;26(Supplement_2):S121-S132. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntad062.
3
Reactions to hypothetical flavor bans among current users of flavored e-cigarettes.当前使用调味电子烟人群对假设性口味禁令的反应。
Transl Behav Med. 2023 Aug 11;13(8):533-538. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibac109.
4
An Estimation of the Prevalence of Smoking and e-Cigarette Use among U.S. Adults If Menthol Cigarettes and Flavored Cigars Are Banned.如果薄荷香烟和调味雪茄被禁止,估计美国成年人的吸烟和电子烟使用情况。
Subst Use Misuse. 2024;59(9):1394-1404. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2024.2352616. Epub 2024 May 9.
5
How Smokers of Menthol Cigarettes and Flavored Cigars Might Respond to FDA's Proposed Bans.薄荷烟和调味雪茄烟吸烟者对 FDA 拟议禁令的可能反应。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2022 Oct 17;24(10):1645-1653. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntac078.
6
Would banning menthol cigarettes, flavored cigars, and flavored e-cigarettes prompt users to seek illicit channels for obtaining them in the United States?在 美国,禁止薄荷醇香烟、调味雪茄和调味电子烟,是否会促使使用者转而通过非法渠道获取这些产品?
Prev Med. 2024 Jun;183:107954. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2024.107954. Epub 2024 Apr 15.
7
The Public Health Impact of a Ban on Flavored Cigars: A Decision-Theoretic Policy Framework.禁止调味雪茄对公共卫生的影响:一个决策理论政策框架。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2025 Jan 22;27(2):333-341. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntae173.
8
Should menthol e-cigarettes be banned? Reaction of adult smokers and users of e-cigarettes to hypothetical bans.含薄荷醇电子烟应被禁止吗?成年吸烟者和电子烟使用者对假设禁令的反应。
Tob Control. 2024 Mar 19;33(e1):e125-e127. doi: 10.1136/tc-2022-057439.
9
An experimental evaluation of the effects of banning the sale of flavored tobacco products on adolescents' and young adults' future nicotine vaping intentions.一项评估禁止销售调味烟草制品对青少年和年轻成年人未来尼古丁吸食意愿影响的实验。
Addict Behav. 2023 Oct;145:107784. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2023.107784. Epub 2023 Jun 19.
10
A randomized controlled trial of potential tobacco policies prohibiting menthol flavor in cigarettes and e-cigarettes: a study protocol.一项关于潜在烟草政策的随机对照试验,即禁止香烟和电子烟中的薄荷醇口味:研究方案。
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Mar 12;24(1):201. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-05619-0.

引用本文的文献

1
A Pilot RCT Exploring Heated Tobacco Product Substitution for Menthol Cigarettes.一项探索加热烟草制品替代薄荷醇香烟的随机对照试验试点研究。
Am J Prev Med. 2025 Aug 3:108029. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2025.108029.
2
Tobacco use behaviors in response to menthol restriction: A scoping review.应对薄荷醇限制的烟草使用行为:一项范围综述。
Tob Induc Dis. 2025 Feb 28;23. doi: 10.18332/tid/200694. eCollection 2025.
3
Impact of Smoking Cessation Motivations and Barriers on Quit Intentions Following a Hypothetical Flavor Ban Among African American/Black Individuals Who Use Menthol Cigarettes: A Mixed-Methods Study.假设薄荷香烟口味禁令后,非裔美国人/黑人使用薄荷香烟者戒烟动机和障碍对戒烟意愿的影响:一项混合方法研究。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2024 May 31;26(Supplement_2):S121-S132. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntad062.
4
Menthol versus tobacco e-liquid flavor: Impact on acute subjective effects, puff patterns, and intentions for use among Black and White menthol smokers.薄荷醇与烟草电子烟液口味:对黑人和白人薄荷醇吸烟者急性主观效应、吸烟模式和使用意向的影响。
Addict Behav. 2024 Aug;155:108038. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2024.108038. Epub 2024 Apr 12.
5
Effects of liquid nicotine concentration and flavour on the acceptability of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) among people who smoke participating in a randomised controlled trial to reduce cigarette consumption.在一项旨在减少卷烟消费的随机对照试验中,液态尼古丁浓度和口味对吸烟人群接受电子尼古丁传送系统(ENDS)的影响。
Tob Control. 2024 Mar 18. doi: 10.1136/tc-2023-058282.
6
Responses to Real-World and Hypothetical Menthol Flavor Bans Among US Young Adults Who Smoke Menthol Cigarettes.回应现实世界和假设的薄荷醇口味禁令对美国吸薄荷醇香烟的年轻人的影响。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2024 May 22;26(6):785-789. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntad259.

本文引用的文献

1
Public health impact of a US menthol cigarette ban on the non-Hispanic black population: a simulation study.美国薄荷香烟禁令对非西班牙裔黑人群体的公共卫生影响:一项模拟研究。
Tob Control. 2023 Dec 13;33(1):126-130. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2022-057298.
2
How Smokers of Menthol Cigarettes and Flavored Cigars Might Respond to FDA's Proposed Bans.薄荷烟和调味雪茄烟吸烟者对 FDA 拟议禁令的可能反应。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2022 Oct 17;24(10):1645-1653. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntac078.
3
Public health impact of a US ban on menthol in cigarettes and cigars: a simulation study.美国禁止薄荷醇在香烟和雪茄中的使用对公共卫生的影响:一项模拟研究。
Tob Control. 2023 Apr;32(e1):e37-e44. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2021-056604. Epub 2021 Sep 2.
4
An Expert Elicitation on the Effects of a Ban on Menthol Cigarettes and Cigars in the United States.关于美国禁止薄荷醇香烟和雪茄的影响的专家意见征集
Nicotine Tob Res. 2021 Oct 7;23(11):1911-1920. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntab121.
5
Changing the Language of How We Measure and Report Smoking Status: Implications for Reducing Stigma, Restoring Dignity, and Improving the Precision of Scientific Communication.改变我们衡量和报告吸烟状况的方式:对减少污名化、恢复尊严以及提高科学传播精准度的影响。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2020 Dec 12;22(12):2280-2282. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntaa141.
6
The Biological Impact of Menthol on Tobacco Dependence.薄荷醇对烟草依赖的生物学影响。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2020 Oct 8;22(10):1676-1684. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntz239.
7
Ban on menthol-flavoured tobacco products predicts cigarette cessation at 1 year: a population cohort study.禁止薄荷味烟草制品可预测吸烟者在 1 年内戒烟:一项基于人群的队列研究。
Tob Control. 2020 May;29(3):341-347. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054841. Epub 2019 May 30.
8
Racial/ethnic differences in daily, nondaily, and menthol cigarette use and smoking quit ratios in the United States: 2002 to 2016.美国日常、非日常和薄荷醇卷烟使用以及戒烟比例的种族/民族差异:2002 年至 2016 年。
Prev Med. 2019 Aug;125:32-39. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.04.009. Epub 2019 Apr 17.
9
Switching to E-Cigarettes in the Event of a Menthol Cigarette Ban.在薄荷醇香烟被禁的情况下转向电子烟。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2015 Oct;17(10):1286-7. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntv021. Epub 2015 Jan 29.
10
Development of the PROMIS nicotine dependence item banks.患者报告结果测量信息系统(PROMIS)尼古丁依赖条目库的开发。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2014 Sep;16 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S190-201. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntu032.

使用薄荷醇卷烟的非裔美国人对潜在调味烟草禁令的反应。

Responses of African American Individuals Who Use Menthol Cigarettes to Potential Flavored Tobacco Bans.

机构信息

Center for the Study of Tobacco Products, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia; Department of Health Behavior and Policy, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia.

Center for the Study of Tobacco Products, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia.

出版信息

Am J Prev Med. 2023 Jun;64(6):898-901. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2022.12.005. Epub 2023 Jan 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.amepre.2022.12.005
PMID:36624010
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10200722/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has proposed new product standards regarding the availability of menthol cigarettes and flavored cigars in the U.S. However, it is unclear whether limiting characterizing flavors in cigarettes and cigars as proposed, or across all tobacco products, produces differential effects on the tobacco use behaviors of African American/Black individuals who use menthol cigarettes. This study assessed whether limiting characterizing flavors in combusted products only or across all tobacco products produces differential impacts on the tobacco use behaviors of African American/Black individuals who use menthol cigarettes.

METHODS

Adult African American/Black individuals who use menthol cigarettes in the U.S. were recruited through Qualtrics (n=373) and in Richmond, VA (n=206) for an online experiment from September 2021 to August 2022. Participants reported how their tobacco use behaviors would change under 3 scenarios: maintenance of the status quo, limited flavor ban (ban characterizing flavors in cigarettes and cigars), and comprehensive flavor ban (ban characterizing flavors in all tobacco products). Seemingly unrelated regressions compared differences in expected responses to policy scenarios (p<0.05).

RESULTS

Both flavor ban scenarios resulted in higher quitting intentions for cigarettes and all tobacco products than the status quo (p<0.05). The comprehensive ban resulted in greater intentions to quit all tobacco products and lower intentions to switch to certain alternative products (e.g., E-cigarettes, smokeless tobacco, heated tobacco products) than the limited ban (p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

African American/Black individuals who use menthol cigarettes appear more likely to quit smoking if characterizing flavors in combusted products (e.g., menthol cigarettes) are banned, regardless of if characterizing flavors are available in noncombusted alternative tobacco products.

摘要

简介

美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)提出了关于美国薄荷醇香烟和调味雪茄供应的新产品标准。然而,目前尚不清楚限制香烟和雪茄中的特征风味(如提议的那样),或限制所有烟草产品中的特征风味,是否会对使用薄荷醇香烟的非裔美国人/黑人的烟草使用行为产生不同的影响。本研究评估了仅限制燃烧产品中的特征风味,还是限制所有烟草产品中的特征风味,对使用薄荷醇香烟的非裔美国人/黑人的烟草使用行为会产生不同的影响。

方法

通过 Qualtrics(n=373)和弗吉尼亚州里士满(n=206)招募了在美国使用薄荷醇香烟的成年非裔美国人/黑人,进行了一项在线实验,时间为 2021 年 9 月至 2022 年 8 月。参与者报告了在 3 种情况下他们的烟草使用行为会如何变化:维持现状、限制风味禁令(禁止香烟和雪茄中的特征风味)和全面风味禁令(禁止所有烟草产品中的特征风味)。似乎不相关的回归比较了对政策情景的预期反应的差异(p<0.05)。

结果

与现状相比,两种风味禁令情景都导致更高的戒烟意愿,无论是香烟还是所有烟草产品(p<0.05)。与限制禁令相比,全面禁令导致更高的戒烟所有烟草产品的意愿和更低的转向某些替代产品(如电子烟、无烟烟草、加热烟草产品)的意愿(p<0.05)。

结论

如果禁止燃烧产品(如薄荷醇香烟)中的特征风味,使用薄荷醇香烟的非裔美国人/黑人似乎更有可能戒烟,无论非燃烧替代烟草产品中是否有特征风味。