经皮骨锚式助听器采用C形和线性切口技术的手术结果比较
Surgical results of transcutaneous bone-anchored hearing aid comparing the C-shaped and linear incision techniques.
作者信息
Miura Mauricio Schneider, Ogando Patrícia Barcelos, Pasqualini Marina Paese, Neves Hemily, Lubianca Neto José Faibes
机构信息
Department of Otolaryngology, Hospital Santa Casa de Porto Alegre, Rua Prof Annes Dias, 295, Centro, Porto Alegre, RS, 90020-160, Brazil.
出版信息
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023 Jun;280(6):2749-2754. doi: 10.1007/s00405-022-07778-w. Epub 2023 Jan 10.
PURPOSE
The aim of the study is to compare the operative time and postoperative complication outcomes for bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA) implants using two different techniques: the C-shaped incision technique and the linear incision technique.
METHODS
An analysis was carried out of 38 patients implanted with transcutaneous BAHAs during a 4-year period in a single otolaryngology department.
RESULTS
The implantation was carried out under general anesthesia. Operative time was significant lower with the linear technique compared to the C-shaped technique (76.55 min, SD 16.75 vs. 93.17 min, SD 19.82; p = 0.007). There was no difference in postoperative complications between the two techniques.
CONCLUSIONS
The use of linear incision for transcutaneous BAHA system implantation is associated with a reduced surgery time compared to the C-shaped technique, with no increase in postoperative complications.
目的
本研究旨在比较采用两种不同技术植入骨锚式助听器（BAHA）的手术时间和术后并发症结果，这两种技术分别为C形切口技术和直线切口技术。
方法
对某单一耳鼻喉科在4年期间内植入经皮式BAHA的38例患者进行分析。
结果
植入手术在全身麻醉下进行。与C形技术相比，直线技术的手术时间显著更短（76.55分钟，标准差16.75 vs. 93.17分钟，标准差19.82；p = 0.007）。两种技术的术后并发症无差异。
结论
与C形技术相比，经皮式BAHA系统植入采用直线切口可缩短手术时间，且不增加术后并发症。
Zotero 插件