Zimmer-Faust Amity G, Griffith John F, Steele Joshua A, Santos Bryan, Cao Yiping, Asato Laralyn, Chiem Tania, Choi Samuel, Diaz Arturo, Guzman Joe, Laak David, Padilla Michele, Quach-Cu Jennifer, Ruiz Victor, Woo Mary, Weisberg Stephen B
Southern California Coastal Water Research Project Authority, 3535 Harbor Blvd., Costa Mesa, CA 92626, United States.
Southern California Coastal Water Research Project Authority, 3535 Harbor Blvd., Costa Mesa, CA 92626, United States.
Water Res. 2023 Feb 15;230:119383. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2022.119383. Epub 2022 Nov 19.
Coliphage have been suggested as an alternative to fecal indicator bacteria for assessing recreational beach water quality, but it is unclear how frequently and at what types of beaches coliphage produces a different management outcome. Here we conducted side-by-side sampling of male-specific and somatic coliphage by the new EPA dead-end hollow fiber ultrafiltration (D-HFUF-SAL) method and Enterococcus at southern California beaches over two years. When samples were combined for all beach sites, somatic and male-specific coliphage both correlated with Enterococcus. When examined categorically, Enterococcus would have resulted in approximately two times the number of health advisories as somatic coliphage and four times that of male-specific coliphage,using recently proposed thresholds of 60 PFU/100 mL for somatic and 30 PFU/100 mL for male-specific coliphage. Overall, only 12% of total exceedances would have been for coliphage alone. Somatic coliphage exceedances that occurred in the absence of an Enterococcus exceedance were limited to a single site during south swell events, when this beach is known to be affected by nearby minimally treated sewage. Thus, somatic coliphage provided additional valuable health protection information, but may be more appropriate as a supplement to FIB measurements rather than as replacement because: (a) EPA-approved PCR methods for Enterococcus allow a more rapid response, (b) coliphage is more challenging owing to its greater sampling volume and laboratory time requirements, and (c) Enterococcus' long data history has yielded predictive management models that would need to be recreated for coliphage.
有人建议将大肠杆菌噬菌体作为评估休闲海滩水质的粪便指示菌的替代物,但目前尚不清楚大肠杆菌噬菌体在何种频率以及何种类型的海滩会产生不同的管理结果。在此,我们在两年时间里,通过新的美国环境保护局(EPA)死端中空纤维超滤(D-HFUF-SAL)方法,对南加州海滩的雄性特异性和体细胞性大肠杆菌噬菌体以及肠球菌进行了并行采样。当将所有海滩地点的样本合并时,体细胞性和雄性特异性大肠杆菌噬菌体均与肠球菌相关。当进行分类检查时,按照最近提议的体细胞性大肠杆菌噬菌体阈值60 PFU/100 mL和雄性特异性大肠杆菌噬菌体阈值30 PFU/100 mL,肠球菌导致的健康建议数量大约是体细胞性大肠杆菌噬菌体的两倍,是雄性特异性大肠杆菌噬菌体的四倍。总体而言,仅12%的总超标情况是由单独的大肠杆菌噬菌体导致的。在没有肠球菌超标情况时出现的体细胞性大肠杆菌噬菌体超标仅限于一次南涌浪事件期间的一个地点,当时已知该海滩受到附近未经充分处理的污水影响。因此,体细胞性大肠杆菌噬菌体提供了额外的有价值的健康保护信息,但作为粪便指示菌(FIB)测量的补充可能更合适,而非替代物,原因如下:(a)EPA批准的肠球菌PCR方法能实现更快的响应;(b)大肠杆菌噬菌体由于其更大的采样量和实验室时间要求,更具挑战性;(c)肠球菌长期的数据历史已产生了预测管理模型,而大肠杆菌噬菌体则需要重新创建这些模型。