Malpas Jean, Pellicane Michael J, Glaeser Elizabeth
The Gender & Family Project, Ackerman Institute for the Family, New York, New York, USA.
Private Practice, New York, New York, USA.
Transgend Health. 2022 Feb 14;7(1):7-29. doi: 10.1089/trgh.2020.0165. eCollection 2022 Feb.
Research on transgender and gender expansive (TGE) youth has highlighted the disproportionate and challenging mental health and developmental outcomes faced by these young people. Research also largely suggests that family acceptance of TGE youth's gender identity and expression is crucial to preventing poor psychosocial outcomes in this community. Recently, family-based treatment has become common practice with TGE youth whose families are available for care, but it is unclear whether research provides outcome data for family interventions with TGE youth. This study follows Preferred Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to systematically review articles that provide outcome data or clinical recommendations for family-based interventions with TGE youth and their families. No quantitative outcome data for family therapy with TGE youth were found, but numerous articles spanning decades (=32) provided clinical practice recommendations for family-based interventions with this population. Very few articles provided outcome data for family therapy with sexual minority youth (=2). Over time, clinical strategies have moved from pathologizing to affirming of TGE youths' gender journey. Common clinical strategies of affirming interventions include (1) providing psychoeducation, (2) allowing space for families to express reactions to their child's gender, (3) emphasizing the protective power of family acceptance, (4) utilizing multiple modalities of support, (5) giving families opportunities for allyship and advocacy, (6) connecting families to TGE community resources, and (7) centering intersectional approaches and concerns. Future research should examine the efficacy of family-based interventions that incorporate these clinical strategies and collect quantitative data to systematically determine their effect on psychosocial outcomes.
对跨性别和性别认同扩展(TGE)青少年的研究凸显了这些年轻人所面临的心理健康和发展结果方面不成比例且具有挑战性的问题。研究还在很大程度上表明,家庭对TGE青少年性别认同和表达的接纳对于预防该群体不良的心理社会结果至关重要。最近,对于有条件接受治疗的TGE青少年家庭来说,基于家庭的治疗已成为常见做法,但尚不清楚研究是否能提供针对TGE青少年家庭干预的结果数据。本研究遵循系统评价与荟萃分析优先报告条目(PRISMA)指南,系统回顾那些为TGE青少年及其家庭的基于家庭的干预提供结果数据或临床建议的文章。未找到关于TGE青少年家庭治疗的定量结果数据,但数十篇文章(共32篇)提供了针对该群体基于家庭干预的临床实践建议。极少有文章提供性少数群体青少年家庭治疗的结果数据(仅2篇)。随着时间推移,临床策略已从将TGE青少年的性别历程病态化转向予以肯定。肯定性干预的常见临床策略包括:(1)提供心理教育;(2)为家庭留出空间,让他们表达对孩子性别的反应;(3)强调家庭接纳的保护作用;(4)运用多种支持方式;(5)为家庭提供成为盟友和进行倡导的机会;(6)将家庭与TGE社区资源相联系;(7)以交叉性方法和关注点为核心。未来的研究应检验纳入这些临床策略的基于家庭干预的效果,并收集定量数据,以系统确定其对心理社会结果的影响。