Grantham James P, Hii Amanda, Bright Tim, Liu David
Department of Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.
Oesophagogastric Surgery Unit, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, SA 5042, Australia.
Case Rep Surg. 2023 Jan 6;2023:5841246. doi: 10.1155/2023/5841246. eCollection 2023.
Rectal foreign bodies form a surprisingly frequent cause of presentation to the emergency department. The materials inserted constitute a wide range of size, shape, and texture with each presenting a unique set of challenges. Despite a seemingly innocuous presentation, if not recognised early and managed accordingly, significant complications can develop including obstruction, perforation, and sphincteric injury. The existing doctrines advocate endoscopic intervention after simple measures fail and advise against the use of laxative therapy due to concerns for complications that may arise. The authors of this study challenge this notion, provided certain conditions are met. . We report the case of a 14-year-old boy who inserted a golf ball into his rectum, which subsequently migrated proximally into the sigmoid colon on plain radiographic films. The patient was asymptomatic on presentation, and there was no clinical evidence of bowel injury or mechanical bowel obstruction. Endoscopic removal of the golf ball was pursued under general anaesthesia. Despite protracted efforts, the golf ball was not able to be retrieved endoscopically. In an attempt to avoid aggressive surgery, volume laxatives were administered with successful passage of the golf ball several hours later.
This case discusses the unique technical challenges, which may be encountered when attempting to retrieve a large, spherical, and non-confirming foreign body entrapped above the rectosigmoid junction and how these factors can complicate endoscopic retrieval. The authors advocate that in the absence of a mechanical bowel obstruction, patients with foreign bodies possessing physical properties that are amenable to spontaneous passage, a trial of strong aperients, should be considered first line. The author's contention is that direct escalation to removal of foreign body in theatre can be resource draining and may expose the patient to additional risk.
直肠异物是急诊就诊的一个出人意料的常见原因。插入的物品在大小、形状和质地方面多种多样,每种都带来一系列独特的挑战。尽管临床表现看似无害,但如果早期未被识别并进行相应处理,可能会出现严重并发症,包括梗阻、穿孔和括约肌损伤。现有理论主张在简单措施失败后进行内镜干预,并因担心可能出现的并发症而建议不要使用泻药疗法。本研究的作者对这一观点提出了质疑,前提是满足某些条件。我们报告了一名14岁男孩的病例,他将一个高尔夫球插入直肠,随后在平片上显示该球向近端迁移至乙状结肠。患者就诊时无症状,也没有肠道损伤或机械性肠梗阻的临床证据。在全身麻醉下尝试通过内镜取出高尔夫球。尽管经过长时间努力,但仍无法通过内镜取出该球。为避免进行激进手术,给予了大容量泻药,数小时后高尔夫球成功排出。
本病例讨论了在试图取出嵌顿于直肠乙状结肠交界处上方的大型、球形且形状不规则的异物时可能遇到的独特技术挑战,以及这些因素如何使内镜取出复杂化。作者主张,在没有机械性肠梗阻的情况下,对于异物的物理特性适合自然排出的患者,首先应考虑试用强效缓泻剂。作者的观点是,直接升级为在手术室取出异物可能会消耗资源,并可能使患者面临额外风险。