Suppr超能文献

抗精神病药物治疗精神分裂症门诊患者的实践和非氯氮平治疗的原因 - 来自丹麦质量评估审计的数据。

Antipsychotic prescribing practices for outpatients with schizophrenia and reasons for non-clozapine treatment - Data from a Danish quality assessment audit.

机构信息

The Mental Health Services East, Region Zealand Psychiatry, Roskilde, Denmark.

Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Nord J Psychiatry. 2023 Jul;77(5):481-490. doi: 10.1080/08039488.2022.2160878. Epub 2023 Jan 18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Clozapine is the gold standard for treating treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) although widely underutilised. Both organisational, patient- and clinician related reasons for the underutilisation have been reported, however, the clinical impact of either in real-world settings is not fully elucidated.

AIM

This audit aimed to evaluate the local antipsychotic (AP) prescribing practices for outpatients with schizophrenia and to assess the spectrum and prevalence of journalised reasons for non-clozapine treatment amongst eligible outpatients.

METHODS

Data on demographics, current and former AP treatments, as well as documented reasons for non-clozapine treatment, was extracted through chart audit.

RESULTS

Of the 668 affiliated outpatients with schizophrenia, 43% were treated with AP polytherapy (APP) and 19.6% with clozapine. The most prevalent reason for clozapine discontinuation was related to side effects whereas the most prevalent reason for refusal or omission of clozapine treatment was related to the associated monitoring regimen.

CONCLUSIONS

This audit showed that APP prescribing is a highly prevalent practice in our services when treating outpatients with schizophrenia and that clozapine is underutilised in a 'last resort' manner. The blood-monitoring regimen associated with clozapine treatment was found to be an important factor in the underutilisation. It seemed, however, that the monitoring constituted a barrier for different reasons, requiring different approaches to remedy. Future studies, directly involving both patients and clinicians in the identification and management of the most clinically relevant barriers and their corresponding facilitators, are warranted.

摘要

背景

氯氮平是治疗治疗抵抗性精神分裂症(TRS)的金标准,尽管它的应用并不广泛。已经报道了组织、患者和临床医生相关的应用不足的原因,但在真实环境中,其临床影响尚未完全阐明。

目的

本审计旨在评估门诊精神分裂症患者的当地抗精神病药物(AP)处方实践,并评估符合条件的门诊患者中记录的非氯氮平治疗原因的范围和流行率。

方法

通过图表审计提取人口统计学、当前和以前的 AP 治疗以及记录的非氯氮平治疗原因的数据。

结果

在 668 名附属门诊精神分裂症患者中,43%接受了 AP 联合治疗(APP),19.6%接受了氯氮平治疗。氯氮平停药的最常见原因与副作用有关,而拒绝或遗漏氯氮平治疗的最常见原因与相关监测方案有关。

结论

本审计表明,在治疗门诊精神分裂症患者时,我们的服务中 APP 处方是一种非常普遍的做法,而氯氮平的应用不足是一种“最后的手段”。与氯氮平治疗相关的血液监测方案被发现是应用不足的一个重要因素。然而,由于不同的原因,监测似乎构成了障碍,需要采取不同的方法来解决。需要进行未来的研究,直接让患者和临床医生参与确定和管理最具临床相关性的障碍及其相应的促进因素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验