Pourbehbahani Zahra, Saemi Esmaeel, Cheng Ming-Yang, Dehghan Mohammad Reza
Department of Motor Behavior and Sport Psychology, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz 6135783151, Iran.
School of Psychology, Beijing Sport University, No. 48 Xinxi Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100084, China.
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Jan 11;13(1):65. doi: 10.3390/bs13010065.
A major concern voiced by motor behavior scientists is to find useful practice techniques that can be effective in improving motor learning and performance. Neurofeedback and self-controlled practice are among the techniques that have recently drawn attention from specialists in this area. The present study examined the additive and individual effects of sensorimotor rhythm (SMR) neurofeedback as well as self-controlled practice on motor learning and performance in novice golfers. In this semi-empirical study, forty adults (20 females, Meanage = 26.10, SD = 5.56 years) were conveniently selected and randomly assigned to four groups: (1) neurofeedback/self-controlled practice, (2) neurofeedback/yoked practice, (3) sham/self-controlled practice, and (4) sham/yoked practice. The participants performed golf putting task in four stages, namely pretest (12 trials), intervention (one day after pretest; 6 sessions, 36 trails each), post-test (one day after intervention; 12 trials), and follow-up (two weeks after interventions; 12 trials). In addition, the participants had their EEG (SMR wave in Cz point) recorded during pretest, post-test, and follow-up. The results indicated that, although no additive effect was observed for the two practices during different stages of the experiment (p > 0.05), in acquisition and post-test stages, SMR neurofeedback and self-controlled practice independently facilitated golf putting (p ≤ 0.05). However, in the follow-up test, only the neurofeedback practice maintained its positive effects (p ≤ 0.05). The results also showed that participation in SMR neurofeedback practice can enhance the power of the SMR wave (p ≤ 0.05), regardless of the type of the self-controlled practice used. In sum, the two practice techniques seem to be independently effective in facilitating motor learning in instructional settings, particularly for golfers.
运动行为科学家表达的一个主要担忧是找到有助于改善运动学习和表现的有效练习技巧。神经反馈和自我控制练习是最近引起该领域专家关注的技巧。本研究考察了感觉运动节律(SMR)神经反馈以及自我控制练习对新手高尔夫球手运动学习和表现的叠加效应和个体效应。在这项半实证研究中,方便选取了40名成年人(20名女性,平均年龄 = 26.10,标准差 = 5.56岁),并随机分为四组:(1)神经反馈/自我控制练习组,(2)神经反馈/匹配练习组,(3)假刺激/自我控制练习组,(4)假刺激/匹配练习组。参与者分四个阶段进行高尔夫球推杆任务,即预测试(12次试验)、干预(预测试后一天;6节训练课,每节36次试验)、后测试(干预后一天;12次试验)和随访(干预后两周;12次试验)。此外,在预测试、后测试和随访期间记录参与者的脑电图(Cz点的SMR波)。结果表明,尽管在实验的不同阶段未观察到两种练习的叠加效应(p > 0.05),但在习得阶段和后测试阶段,SMR神经反馈和自我控制练习分别促进了高尔夫球推杆表现(p ≤ 0.05)。然而,在随访测试中,只有神经反馈练习保持了其积极效果(p ≤ 0.05)。结果还表明,无论使用何种自我控制练习类型,参与SMR神经反馈练习都能增强SMR波的功率(p ≤ 0.05)。总之,这两种练习技巧在教学环境中似乎能独立有效地促进运动学习,尤其是对高尔夫球手而言。