Vergara-Fernández Melissa, Heilmann Conrad, Szymanowska Marta
Erasmus Institute for Philosophy and Economics (EIPE), Erasmus School of Philosophy, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Department of Finance, Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Eur J Philos Sci. 2023;13(1):6. doi: 10.1007/s13194-022-00506-5. Epub 2023 Jan 21.
Philosophers of science typically focus on the epistemic performance of scientific models when evaluating them. Analysing the effects that models may have on the world has typically been the purview of sociologists of science. We argue that the reactive (or "performative") effects of models should also figure in model evaluations by philosophers of science. We provide a detailed analysis of how models in financial economics created the impetus for the growing importance of the phenomenon of "passive investing" in financial markets. Considering this case motivates the position that we call contextualism about model evaluation, or for short. Model contextualism encompasses standard analyses of the epistemic performance of the model, but also includes their reactive aspects. It entails identifying the , the ways in which a model can engender change in the world (which we call the ), and the .
科学哲学家在评估科学模型时通常关注其认知表现。分析模型可能对世界产生的影响通常属于科学社会学家的研究范畴。我们认为,模型的反应性(或“执行性”)影响也应在科学哲学家的模型评估中占有一席之地。我们详细分析了金融经济学中的模型如何为金融市场中“被动投资”现象日益重要创造了动力。考虑这个案例促使我们提出一种我们称之为模型评估情境主义的立场,简而言之。模型情境主义涵盖了对模型认知表现的标准分析,但也包括其反应性方面。它需要识别模型作用机制,即模型能够在世界上引发变化的方式(我们称之为作用方式),以及作用条件。