Forensic Psychology Section, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University.
Top Cogn Sci. 2024 Oct;16(4):770-776. doi: 10.1111/tops.12640. Epub 2023 Feb 2.
This article discusses the possibility of practitioners who mistake organic memory loss for dissociative amnesia. It starts with the case of a young man with complete retrograde amnesia due to a traumatic head injury. Because he did not show any gross neurological abnormalities, a neurologist thought his amnesia had a psychological origin. An extensive neuropsychological examination revealed that the man did have an organic reason for his amnesia. Next, the existence of dissociative memory loss as well as isolated organic retrograde amnesia is considered. While cases of organic memory loss are well-documented, there is hardly any evidence for dissociative amnesia. It is argued that organic memory loss might be mistakenly taken for dissociative amnesia. In line with the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, practitioners are advised to rule out the possibility of organic memory loss, before diagnosing a patient with dissociative amnesia.
本文探讨了从业者将器质性遗忘误认为分离性遗忘的可能性。文章从一位因头部创伤而导致完全逆行性遗忘的年轻男子的病例开始。由于他没有表现出任何明显的神经学异常,一位神经学家认为他的遗忘症具有心理起源。广泛的神经心理学检查显示,该男子的遗忘症确实有器质性原因。接下来,考虑了分离性记忆缺失以及孤立性器质性逆行性遗忘的存在。虽然器质性遗忘症的病例有充分的记录,但几乎没有任何证据表明存在分离性遗忘症。有人认为器质性遗忘症可能被误认为是分离性遗忘症。根据《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第五版的建议,在诊断分离性遗忘症患者之前,从业者应排除器质性遗忘症的可能性。