Suppr超能文献

多支血管病变或左主干冠状动脉疾病行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗 10 年的结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Ten-year outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting for multivessel or left main coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Geriatrics, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, 3 Kang fu Qian Street, Er Qi District, Zhengzhou, 450052, Henan, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

J Cardiothorac Surg. 2023 Feb 2;18(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s13019-023-02101-y.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Short-term and long-term comparative outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for multivessel coronary artery (MVCA) or left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease are highly debated.

GOALS

We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the difference between PCI and CABG for the treatment of patients with MVCA or LMCA in long-term follow-up.

METHODS

Literatures were searched in PubMed, EMBASE and The Cochrane Library from January 1, 2000 to January 1, 2021, including RCTs and observational studies (OSs). The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at 10 years follow-up, and the secondary outcomes included cardiac mortality, repeated revascularization, myocardial infarction, and stroke.

RESULTS

A total of 5 RCTs reporting data from 3013 participants and 4 OSs of 5608 participants were included for analysis. There was no significant difference between PCI and CABG in all-cause mortality (Odds Ratio (OR) 1.03 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.89 to 1.19]), whereas PCI was associated with higher cardiac mortality (OR 0.76 [95% CI 0.65 to 0.90]) and repeated revascularization rate comparing to CABG (OR 1.77 [95% CI 1.08 to 2.89]; I = 94.61%). The difference between PCI and CABG in repeated revascularization in either RCTs or OSs, in myocardial infarction in either RCTs or OSs were not significant. In OSs, stroke rate in PCI group was lower than those in CABG, but not in RCTs. There was a significant increase of stroke rate in CABG comparing to PCI (OR 0.65 [95% CI 0.53 to 0.80]; I = 0.00%). No significant difference between PCI and CABG in myocardial infarction was not observed (OR 0.92 [95% CI 0.64 to 1.31]; I = 57.84%).

CONCLUSION

Evidence from our study and prior studies suggested the superiority of CABG over PCI in improving 5- but not 10-year survival among patients with MVCA. In the contrast, there was no significant difference between CABG and PCI for treating patients with LMCA in either 5- or 10-year survival rate. More long-term trials are needed to better define differences of outcome between 2 techniques.

摘要

背景

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)和冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)治疗多支冠状动脉(MVCA)或左主干冠状动脉(LMCA)疾病的短期和长期比较结果存在较大争议。

目的

我们进行了一项荟萃分析,以评估在长期随访中,PCI 和 CABG 治疗 MVCA 或 LMCA 患者的差异。

方法

从 2000 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 1 月 1 日,在 PubMed、EMBASE 和 The Cochrane Library 中检索文献,包括随机对照试验(RCT)和观察性研究(OS)。主要结局为 10 年随访时的全因死亡率,次要结局包括心源性死亡率、再次血运重建、心肌梗死和卒中等。

结果

共纳入 5 项 RCT 报道的 3013 名参与者的数据和 4 项 OS 报道的 5608 名参与者的数据进行分析。PCI 和 CABG 在全因死亡率方面无显著差异(优势比(OR)1.03 [95%置信区间(CI)0.89 至 1.19]),但 PCI 与 CABG 相比,心源性死亡率(OR 0.76 [95%CI 0.65 至 0.90])和再次血运重建率更高(OR 1.77 [95%CI 1.08 至 2.89];I=94.61%)。无论是 RCT 还是 OS,PCI 和 CABG 在再次血运重建或心肌梗死方面的差异均无统计学意义。在 OS 中,PCI 组的卒中发生率低于 CABG 组,但在 RCT 中并非如此。与 PCI 相比,CABG 的卒中发生率显著升高(OR 0.65 [95%CI 0.53 至 0.80];I=0.00%)。在 OS 中,CABG 组与 PCI 组的心肌梗死发生率无显著差异(OR 0.92 [95%CI 0.64 至 1.31];I=57.84%)。

结论

本研究和既往研究的证据表明,在改善 MVCA 患者 5 年而非 10 年生存率方面,CABG 优于 PCI。相比之下,CABG 和 PCI 治疗 LMCA 患者在 5 年或 10 年生存率方面无显著差异。需要更多的长期试验来更好地确定两种技术之间的结果差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7bde/9893531/7e4d39c257be/13019_2023_2101_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验