Wu Mengjuan, Zhao Ting, Zhang Qian, Zhang Tao, Wang Lei, Sun Gang
Country College of Public Health, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China.
Department of Medical Record Management, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, Xinjiang, China.
Front Oncol. 2023 Jan 17;12:1044945. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1044945. eCollection 2022.
To examine the factors that affect the prognosis and survival of breast cancer patients who were diagnosed at the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University between 2015 and 2021, forecast the overall survival (OS), and assess the clinicopathological traits and risk level of prognosis of patients in various subgroups.
First, nomogram model was constructed using the Cox proportional hazards models to identify the independent prognostic factors of breast cancer patients. In order to assess the discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility of the model, additional tools such as the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration curve, and clinical decision curve analysis (DCA) were used. Finally, using two-step cluster analysis (TCA), the patients were grouped in accordance with the independent prognostic factors. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was employed to compare prognostic risk among various subgroups.
T-stage, N-stage, M-stage, molecular subtyping, type of operation, and involvement in postoperative chemotherapy were identified as the independent prognostic factors. The nomogram was subsequently constructed and confirmed. The area under the ROC curve used to predict 1-, 3-, 5- and 7-year OS were 0.848, 0.820, 0.813, and 0.791 in the training group and 0.970, 0.898, 0.863, and 0.798 in the validation group, respectively. The calibration curves of both groups were relatively near to the 45° reference line. And the DCA curve further demonstrated that the nomogram has a higher clinical utility. Furthermore, using the TCA, the patients were divided into two subgroups. Additionally, the two groups' survival curves were substantially different. In particular, in the group with the worse prognosis (the majority of patients did not undergo surgical therapy or postoperative chemotherapy treatment), the T-, N-, and M-stage were more prevalent in the advanced, and the total points were likewise distributed in the high score side.
For the survival and prognosis of breast cancer patients in Xinjiang, the nomogram constructed in this paper has a good prediction value, and the clustering results further demonstrated that the selected factors were important. This conclusion can give a scientific basis for tailored treatment and is conducive to the formulation of focused treatment regimens for patients in practical practice.
探讨2015年至2021年在新疆医科大学附属肿瘤医院确诊的乳腺癌患者的预后和生存影响因素,预测总生存期(OS),并评估各亚组患者的临床病理特征及预后风险水平。
首先,使用Cox比例风险模型构建列线图模型,以识别乳腺癌患者的独立预后因素。为评估该模型的区分度、校准度和临床实用性,还使用了其他工具,如受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线、校准曲线和临床决策曲线分析(DCA)。最后,采用两步聚类分析(TCA),根据独立预后因素对患者进行分组。采用Kaplan-Meier生存分析比较各亚组的预后风险。
T分期、N分期、M分期、分子亚型、手术类型和术后化疗参与情况被确定为独立预后因素。随后构建并验证了列线图。训练组用于预测1年、3年、5年和7年OS的ROC曲线下面积分别为0.848、0.820、0.813和0.791,验证组分别为0.970、0.898、0.863和0.798。两组的校准曲线均相对接近45°参考线。DCA曲线进一步表明列线图具有更高的临床实用性。此外利用TCA将患者分为两个亚组。另外,两组的生存曲线有显著差异。特别是在预后较差的组(大多数患者未接受手术治疗或术后化疗)中,T、N和M分期在晚期更为普遍,总分也同样分布在高分侧。
本文构建的列线图对新疆乳腺癌患者的生存和预后具有良好的预测价值,聚类结果进一步证明所选择的因素具有重要意义。这一结论可为个体化治疗提供科学依据,有利于在实际临床中为患者制定针对性的治疗方案。